http://www.usp.nus.edu.sg/post/singapore/government/leekuanyew/lky2.html
Singapore has a Fossil Fuel System
No fools.
Yes, civil cases can be tried by a jury in the legal system.
Yes, it can be. For instance, jury members can be intimidated or bribed.
It was to abolish the capital system
The abstract noun of "abolish" is "abolition" which refers to the act of officially ending or abolishing something, typically a law, system, or practice.
According to Singapore's flexible wage system, There is no minimum wage requirement in Singapore
The advantages of the jury system are as follows : * The jury system allows the general people of the country to take part in the administration of justice. * The jury service has necome a convention in the UK, which provides confidence to the people about the impartiality and fairness of the jury trials. * Since jurors are lay people who are not legal experts, they decide cases on the basis of fairness. This reduces the harshness of the legal system.
The jury is the cornerstone of the civil justice system because it allows a defendant to be judged by a jury of their peers. This consist of men and women for his community, rather than by a judge.
Singapore is a constitutional democracy, following the parliamentary system which she inherited from the British.
A jury in Australia is made up of 12 people chosen at random from the locality.
The Athenian jury system selected jurors randomly from a pool of volunteers, while the US jury system selects jurors from voter registration or drivers license lists. In Athens, the jury size could be up to 501 citizens, while in the US, a standard jury size is 12. Additionally, in Athens, jurors voted by placing a token in one of two urns, whereas in the US, jurors deliberate and reach a consensus verdict.