A) Nobody ever admits to those.
B) It could lead to all sorts of prosecutions
C) The UN doesn't do anything which could be genocidal - maybe its individual member states forces did something which was, but that is not the same as the UN doing it.
Countries that have signed the UN definition of genocide are obligated to prevent and punish the crime of genocide, as outlined in the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. This includes enacting legislation to penalize acts of genocide, cooperating with international legal mechanisms, and taking action to prevent situations that could lead to genocide. Additionally, they are required to investigate and prosecute those accused of committing genocide within their jurisdiction.
It depends on the genocide. There are some genocides, like the East Timor Genocide, that the UN did help to stop. There are some genocides, like the Rwanda Genocide, that the UN ignored. There are some genocides like the Holocaust, which occurred prior to the UN's existence.
Boutros Boutros-Ghali was the SG of the UN during the Rwandan genocide.
The UN did not recognise <the Darfur case> as genocide, although UN sent peace keepers. General public, press, writers, human right organisations remembers the Darfur case as Massacre. Many consder its as e Genocide.
The Article 2 of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.
they send in troops from the UN to stop the genocide
The United Nations did not exist at the time of the Armenian genocide, which occurred between 1915 and 1923. However, in the years following World War II, the UN has recognized the importance of preventing such atrocities and has established conventions, like the Genocide Convention of 1948. The UN has also acknowledged the Armenian genocide through various resolutions and statements, particularly in the context of promoting awareness and historical recognition. Despite this, the UN's actions have often been limited by political considerations and the reluctance of some member states to formally recognize the genocide.
not treated well by UN. Press and public reacted well
During the Tutsi genocide in Rwanda in 1994, the Secretary-General of the United Nations was Boutros Boutros-Ghali. He served in this role from 1992 to 1996 and faced significant criticism for the UN's response to the genocide, where inadequate intervention and a lack of resources contributed to the scale of the atrocities.
Genocide. The UN won't admit it, but the Burmese government is preforming an ethnic cleansing upon the Karen and minority people. They killing, raping, murdering, poisoning, and forcing these people to flee their awful regime. It's truly horrible, and there is very little being done about it.
MIllions of hutus and \tsustis would have lived
Bosnians were killed by Serbs, even though they were under protection by the UN