If you have violated the terms of your parole - you can expect a harsh sentence.
A non-witness violation hearing is a probation violation hearing in which no witnesses are called. Hard evidence will be documented and the defendant, probationer, will have opportunity to offer argument against it, or to offer explanation that might mediate a decision.
It is not uncommon for the probation department to review your case shortly before discharge, then recommend a violation based upon your non-compliance. The hearing on such an end-of-probation violation may well occur after what would otherwise have been the discharge date.
Between 15-24 months for good behavior, generally 1/3 to 1/2 the sentenced time if its non violant probation violation.
Colorado, or any other state, isn't going to have a time limit. Violation of parole is similar to an escape from prison. If they catch you, you can be immediately returned to jail/prison to finish your sentence.
It depends on what the violation or non compliance involves. It could result in no sanction at all or confinement for the remainder of sentence.
SOL's apply only to non-adjudicated offenses. There are no SOL's for probation violation. You have already been pronounced guilty and probation is your SENTENCE. If you violate your sentence it is pretty much the same as violating your jail time.
NO
Free man mean not a Servant (Ghulam), no non Muslim cant be witness.
We're fine with it.
No states are "non-extradition" for any state parole violation. Neither are the US territories.
No. Your moving violation CAN be changed to a non-moving violation ONLY by the judge that you see when you go to court for that violation BEFORE payment. By paying your ticket, you are basically pleading guilty and waiving your right to a trial.
A non-evidentiary hearing is a legal proceeding where the parties involved present arguments, legal theories, or interpretations of the law without introducing physical evidence or witness testimony. These hearings typically focus on procedural matters, motions, or legal issues that can be resolved based on existing records or briefs submitted by the parties. The judge or hearing officer makes decisions based on the legal arguments presented rather than evaluating factual evidence.