no yes yes no 1
01 yes if sales of some item for cash or repayment for advance take on a ward example i take it and here some down payment we say o word as if he will pay saying Saturday payday person 2
any person who take a thing yes i pay or here it was not working as you said fix it
no law men shall write it down or they broke the law that why they shot when we ask what happen we expect the truth so why said she he we no sir no Mr did you write printed or did he she the city county federal state or so call peace us his pen no so cap is a liar what ever x come from his voca voice said sad ha liar cops sogn no so cops is a liar
No, California does not honor oral agreements in the court of law.
A properly written contract, signed by both parties, is tangible evidence of an agreement that is indisputably "legally binding".Generally, the problem with verbal agreements is that there is no evidence they exist. There is only a "he said, and he said" situation. In order to bind the other party to a verbal agreement, the moving party would need to bring an action in a court of equity and provide the judge with enough outside evidence that there was a verbal contract between the parties and the other party has breached it. Without compelling outside evidence such as witnesses, the judge cannot find that any contract existed between the parties.
Yes, both verbal and written agreements can be enforced by law. Verbal agreements are, however, difficult to prove without other evidence. Otherwise anyone could say that another person verbally agreed to something, even if they hadn't. In addition, most states require some written documentation regarding the exchange of land. If there is no writing, the agreement for the sale or exchange of land will not be enforcable.
Properly executed written agreements are one of the best forms of evidence in any court proceeding.
In New York, verbal agreements can be enforceable in certain situations, but they are often difficult to prove in court due to the lack of written documentation. While some contracts can be oral, specific types, such as those involving real estate or lasting longer than one year, must be in writing to be legally binding under the Statute of Frauds. Therefore, while verbal agreements exist, they carry risks and may not hold up in court without corroborating evidence. It’s generally advisable to have agreements documented in writing for clarity and enforceability.
Yes, you can take someone to small claims court based on a verbal agreement. However, it may be more challenging to prove the terms of the agreement without a written contract. It's important to gather any evidence or witnesses that can support your claim.
Yes, an oral contract can be enforced. And if the services have been rendered, the court will not allow them to be unjustly enriched.
Yes, verbal contracts are also binding
In some cases, yes, a verbal agreement can be legally binding and enforceable in court. However, it may be difficult to prove the terms of the agreement without written documentation or witnesses. It is generally advisable to put important agreements in writing to avoid misunderstandings and legal disputes.
By "legal" I assume that you mean binding. Any contract is an enforceable agreement between two or more parties. Whether written or oral, if the Court can identify the bargain and ascertain that there is consideration (something of value) the Court can enforce the contract.The contract is either binding and enforceable or it is not. Whether it was written down or simply an oral agreement does not matter.If the Court cannot determine what the actual bargain was, the court will likely conclude that there was no contract. With a written contract, the Court may find that a term in the contract was ambiguous. It can then solicit testimony from the parties as to what they meant by that term.For the person seeking to enforce the contract it is always better to have an actual written agreement that can be placed before the Court. The Court will be more certain that there was, in fact, a contract. For this reason oral agreements can be more difficult to enforce. Also, the Statute of Frauds requires certain contracts (such as for the sale of land) to be in writing.Edward X. Clinton, Jr.2009
Contract. There are two forms of enforceable actions in court under this question: 1) A Written Contract - signed by all parties, and any amendments to the contract 2) A verbal agreement, where it can be shown there was some form of agreement between he parties, and that one or more parties took action to fulfill the terms of the agreement (action to fulfill the terms constitutes a binding contract)
A contract is binding, whether written or verbal. The advantage to having something in writing is that you have proof. But if a case can be reasonably proven, a verbal contract can be upheld in court.