Yes, a convicted felon can potentially be charged with possession of a firearm if they take a picture of one, depending on the jurisdiction and the circumstances. Laws regarding possession can vary, and in some cases, simply having control over a firearm, including taking its picture, could be interpreted as possession. However, whether charges would be brought would depend on the specific facts of the case and local laws. It's advisable for individuals in such situations to consult legal counsel.
Two pounds is clearly a "commercial" amount and you will probably be charged with PWID (possession With Intent to Distribute) - the Feds may even enter the picture. Unless it is plea bargained down, you're probably looking at a felony stretch.
Each picture is a separate offense. It would be double jeapordy (which is prohibited by the Constitution) if you were charged and tried more than once for the same picture.
It is reason enough to get a search of the persons house and car etc.
While he was caught in a picture taking a hit from a bong, the local prosecutors' office has declined to charge him with any crime. It does not appear that anyone was charged in this case.
If you are the legal owner you should have in your possession all his travel papers and vaccination and health documents.
I think the of phrase can be much longer than the possessive phrase. Their meanings are the same and they both show possession but the first example that you gave can be longer.
Crediting a source will not exempt you from being charged with copyright infringement.
They charge based on the size. the cost will also vary based on the style of frame.
It is the image that a shooter sees when looking through the sights of a firearm at a target, and shows the alignment of rear sight, front sight and target.
If I remember correctly, they painted that very large picture on a wall, using illegal colors.
When Sherlock Holmes goes to retrieve the picture that Irene Adler has in her possession, she leaves suddenly when Holmes realizes where the picture is when he fooled her. She leaves never to return with her new husband and left Holmes a letter explaining that he almost fooled her, but she caught on.
Yes, of course, as long as they have some form of government issued picture ID card just like everyone else. The question for them becomes -, if they are on probation or parole are they violating the restrictions on travel.