Only one officer is required.
No, any citizen can make an arrest, not just a uniformed police officer.
Any duly consitituted law enforcement officer possessing the power of arrest may arrest a judge. An exception may be if the judge is actually on the bench and presiding at an in-session court hearing. Then the arrest may have to wait until his/her court is adjourned for the day.
The complaint itself is evidence. If the officer feels that the complaint fills the need for probable cause, they may arrest on just that information.
Police are subject to arrest just like any other citizen.
An example of a wrongful arrest would be a retail employee or owner holding a customer against their wil with only probable cause, and the police arresting them with only their word against the customer's. People involved in a wrongful arrest case may file a lawsuit against the arresting officer, the police department, or township for damages-emotional or mental distress and embarrassment
A federal marshal does have a wide jurisdiction and can arrest a military official just like anyone else, but normally military police and a military court will deal with a soldier in an arrest case (if it happened on military property or while they are in service (DEPLOYED). Just because you are a soldier doesn't make you any less vulnerable to arrest. A village police officer can arrest a military official if a violation occurs in their jurisdiction. No soldier immunity in the U.S.Cheers!
If it is just an officer asking and you are not under arrest at the time you may decline to be questioned although if you are hiding information that will help the case and it is determined that this is so, you can be charged with obstructing an officer.
It means the police officer has a choice. example: a police officer pulls you over for a minor traffic violation (not stopping at a stop sign) he has a choice of whether to give you a ticket or a warning (written or verbal). This is called discretion. Another example would be urinating in public, the officer uses his/her discretion on whether or not to make an arrest or just issue a ticket violation. Police don't have discretion in all circumstances. Law and departmental policy can limit or eliminate discretion. For example, if an officer witnesses a felony, law requires the officer arrest the suspect. And, departmental policy might require an officer issue citations for all seat belt violations.
I asked a friend, who is a police officer, this very question once. He explained that it is just a way to say that someone was caught--like grabbing someone by the collar.
it means you are not allowing the police officer to continue with his job. Or just interfering or hindering with the officer
It depends on what you mean by threaten. Very generally speaking, it isn't legal to use a weapon to threaten another person who does not have a weapon, but there are other types of threats that can be used under certain circumstances. For instance, it may be legal to threaten to arrest someone, or to threaten to handcuff the person. It just depends on the circumstances.
A police officer their role is to protect and serve the people to make a place a safe place to live. The police puts away the ones that comits crimes in their area. The federal can go about anywhere to help out the state or local police departments. The federal they also at times have to go under cover just like the police to catch a person that has committed a crime, just like the police the federal is here to protect.