If i understand your question correctly, you have a court coming up and you have a warrant for a different offence. If the court is aware the answer is yes. The court has the right to not act on it also depending what the offence is. Since you have a court date coming up I would imagine you have an attorney. Make sure he is aware of this. I f you don't have an attorney I would get one now. Its 50/50 wheather they will serve the warrant or not, I have seen it go both ways.
A capias is a warrant or order for arrest of a person, typically issued by the judge or magistrate in a case. A capias may be issued in different forms. A capias is commonly issued for a failure to appear in court. A capias may be based upon an affidavit alleging personal knowledge of the offense. What the significance of the letters "GS" and "NOT" mean, I cannot tell you. Perhaps some type of court 'shorthand' or a notation that may mean something to that particular local court. G S stands for general sessions court.
An original capias with TRN typically refers to a document issued by a court ordering the arrest of an individual who has failed to appear for a court hearing. TRN stands for "tracking number," which helps authorities keep records of the arrest warrant and subsequent proceedings related to the case.
A capias is a warrant or order for arrest of a person, typically issued by the judge or magistrate in a case. It is an "original' warrant instituted by a judicial officer themself, and not upon the affidavit of law enforcement. It is effective until you are apprehended, the capias is withdrawn by the judicial officer who issued it, or the statute of limitations on the offense runs out.
Warrants never expire. They exist until canceled by the judge. Of course every case is different. Providing a additional details will help. Include the degree misdemeanor or felony, jurisdiction, and failure to appear or capias warrant. Most law enforcement agencies will send felony warrants to the NCIC, however their not required to send the warrant to the NCIC.
A bench warrant is issued by the Court. A private citizen or his attorney isn't the originating agent, the Court (the judge) is. The Court has sole discretion in this, and cannot be compelled to issue a bench warrant.
The man stated that unless the police had a warrant, they could not take the case to court.
Unless the warrant is from a federal court, the Social Security Administration is unlikely to know anything about it. That may be the case even if the warrant is from a federal court.
Not usually. You just lose the case.
No, but the court in Texas can ask that you be held for extradition as soon as the Georgia court is through with you. You would then be brought back to Texas to answer to the charges on the Texas warrant.
The 1987 Supreme Court case that supported the use of evidence obtained with a search warrant that was inaccurate in its specifics is Massachusetts v. Sheppard. In this case, the court ruled that as long as the police officers acted in good faith reliance on the warrant, the evidence could still be used against the defendant.
Yes.
No. Only the court (Judges) may issue a warrant for someone's arrest. No lender may have you arrested for not paying a loan, however, if you don't show up to court (or have legal representation at court), the judge may issue a bench warrant for your arrest (with the intention of getting you in front of the court, not to put you in jail). If the default, however, is subsequently believed to be a result of fraud, the judge may pass the particulars of the case to a prosecutor who will likely request a warrant for your arrest. In this case, the warrant is meant to hold you for trial in criminal court.