no
A polygraph examination is admissible in court only by the stipulation (agreement) of both parties. This is true in all U.S. courts, not just Indiana. Polygraph evidence is seldom used in court.
No, polygraph tests are not admissible in court. Court precedents have decided that the polygraph test is unreliable, and that the test could dishonestly persuade the jury's verdict. The polygraph test is only used for investigative, law enforcement needs.
AA meetings can be admissible in court. If they are court ordered or relevant to an issue or evidence, then it usually is admissible.
Polygraph results are generally not admissible in court-martial proceedings. The military courts typically follow similar standards to civilian courts regarding the reliability and validity of polygraph tests. While they may be used in investigations or as part of a plea deal, their results cannot be relied upon as definitive evidence in court.
Hearsay
Your mode of dress is not admissible in court. The evidence cries to be admissible, your honor!
Yes, text messages are generally admissible as evidence in court, as long as they meet the requirements for authenticity and relevance.
Yes, video recordings can be admissible as evidence in court, as long as they meet certain criteria such as relevance, authenticity, and reliability.
Yes, cell phone video can be admissible as evidence in court if it meets the necessary legal requirements and is authenticated properly.
Yes, video evidence is generally admissible in court as long as it meets certain criteria, such as being relevant, authentic, and not unfairly prejudicial.
The evidence was not admissible in court due to it having no relevance to the proceedings.
Yes, a recorded phone call can be admissible in court as evidence, but it must meet certain legal requirements to be considered admissible, such as being relevant to the case and obtained legally.