A security officer's primary responsibility should be to ensure the safety and security of people, property, and information within their designated area. This includes monitoring surveillance systems, conducting regular patrols, and responding to incidents or alarms. Additionally, they should communicate effectively with law enforcement and emergency services when necessary and maintain a strong presence to deter potential criminal activity. Overall, their role is to create a safe environment through vigilance and proactive measures.
Honestly speaking I think that the governors should be responsible for that by doing the following: 1. Get good security Officers. 2. Ensure that there is less traffic congestion. (which should be done by the security officers).
Yes,oh course i think they should
I think this is best answered by the old aphorism that security is everyone's responsibility. In practice there is likely to be a member of the Board who has the overall accountability and this person may be termed a Senior Information Risk Owner. Alternatively it may be the Chief Information Officer, the Chief Finance Officer or the Chief Executive Officer who has this accountability. Such officers are usually advised by experts in security and these may fall under the overall management of a Chief Information Security Officer. For best practice, everyone in the organisation should be given an appropriate level of security awareness training.
Contrary to popular belief, Security Officers do have authority, and in many cases they have just as much, if not more authority than a Police Officer. Security Officers are basically private police and in the olden days they were often referred to as this (ex: Coal Mine Police). A security company is contracted out by a client to protect 'usually' private property, so therefore they are the police of that property. This is why Security Officers often have more authority than Police Officers. Police have very limited authority on private property unless a warrant is issued by a judge. Also, in many states security companies will be contracted out by local governments to police their public areas. For example; in South Carolina every Security Officer has as much authority as a Police Officer and have the right to issue speeding tickets, arrests, etc. They also use blue lights on their vehicles instead of the usual yellow lights used by most Security Officers around the country. Security Officers often have serious, dangerous jobs much like police officers and they are here to accomplish the same goal which is to keep people, and property safe. So next time you want to bash a Security Officer; think twice.
I think about 50 an hour
Contrary to popular belief, Security Officers do have authority, and in many cases they have just as much, if not more authority than a Police Officer. Security Officers are basically private police and in the olden days they were often referred to as this (ex: Coal Mine Police). A security company is contracted out by a client to protect 'usually' private property, so therefore they are the police of that property. This is why Security Officers often have more authority than Police Officers. Police have very limited authority on private property unless a warrant is issued by a judge. Also, in many states security companies will be contracted out by local governments to police their public areas. For example; in South Carolina every Security Officer has as much authority as a Police Officer and have the right to issue speeding tickets, arrests, etc. They also use blue lights on their vehicles instead of the usual yellow lights used by most Security Officers around the country. Security Officers often have serious, dangerous jobs much like police officers and they are here to accomplish the same goal which is to keep people, and property safe. So next time you want to bash a Security Officer; think twice.
No, I do not think that social security numbers should be removed and a new means of identification be initiated. That leaves too many opportunities for error.
The policies that enforce the responsibility of others is leading them in a environment that has liberty. You should cultivate mutual respect and encourage the others to be themselves.
The enlightenment thinking on natural rights is a philosophy and not an actual power. A person has no responsibility to the idea of natural rights.
You should think about the size of them. Also if people will notice them and be able to hide from them.
As a girl myself I think it should be the girl's responsibilty to respond but not to hold the conversation.
I think you mean priority...