An obstructing government operations charge typically involves actions that intentionally interfere with the functions or duties of government officials or agencies. This can include hindering law enforcement activities, disrupting public meetings, or impeding the execution of legal processes. The specifics of the charge and its penalties can vary by jurisdiction, but it generally aims to maintain the integrity and efficacy of governmental operations.
To my knowledge there is no such charge (as you have worded it) contained in law. You must be more specific about what the actual charge was, and what actions precipitated it.
It sounds from the question, as if the defendant was charged for TWO offenses. The one for which he was arrested, and the obstruction charge (when he apparently 'resisted' the arrest). . The question indicates that he was found not guilty of the original arrest charge, but WAS found guilty of obstructing the officer.
What object? Obstructing what?
it means you are not allowing the police officer to continue with his job. Or just interfering or hindering with the officer
are responsible for providing reliable and useful information for accountability of government programs and their operations.
I think the provincial government is in charge of zoos.
PC 148 A 1 refers to the California Penal Code section for resisting, delaying or obstructing a police officer in the performance of their duties. It is generally classified as a misdemeanor offense, punishable by fines and possible imprisonment.
Municipal government is the local government in charge of a town or city.
the transport government
what ranch of government is in charge of the gas pices
The Canadian Federal Government is in charge of the administration of the country and for the levy of taxes.
a president is in charge