Of course I'll submit to a polygraph test.
No it is not required.
As of my last update, several states require applicants for state trooper positions to undergo a polygraph test as part of the hiring process. These states include California, New York, and Texas, among others. The use of polygraph tests can vary by agency within each state, so it's essential to check the specific requirements for the state police agency you are interested in. Always refer to the latest guidelines from the respective state police departments for the most accurate information.
No, the results of polygraph tests are inadmissible in court as evidence.Added: They can, however, be used by law enforcement as an aid to investigation.
Polygraph examiner
The polygraph test is not "proof-positive". The polygraph test is not completely unreliable.
parts of a polygraph machine
In most states, no. However, in some states they are allowed under certain circumstances. It's typically not within the trial judge's discretion when to and not to admit this evidence. Most states' appellate/supreme courts have set out rules in case law for when polygraph is admissible. For example, in several states, a polygraph is admissible in a criminal case when it is first introduced by the defendant, but the state may not be the first to introduce it. However, if the defendant introduces a polygraph test, the state may rebut that evidence with a conflicting exam.
Polygraph or 'lie detector' machines is a technology is that is still not generally liked or trusted technology. Trained, experienced people make a living from polygraph use is still hard. Talking with some who are already working in the field would be best able to help you
AHH a lie detector ANSWER by Engl1sh: A perfessional typically uses the term 'polygraph' test.
American Polygraph Association was created in 1966.
Polygraph tests, commonly known as lie detector tests, have been used in various court cases, though their admissibility varies by jurisdiction. While some courts accept polygraph results as supplementary evidence, others exclude them due to concerns over their reliability and the potential for misleading juries. For instance, in the 1998 case of United States v. Scheffer, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the exclusion of polygraph results did not violate a defendant's rights. Overall, the use of polygraphs in court remains controversial and often depends on the specific legal context.