No, a simple subject and a direct object are different grammatical concepts. A simple subject refers to the main noun or pronoun that the sentence is about, while a direct object is the noun or pronoun that receives the action of the verb in a sentence.
Maybe "intransitive"??? = a verb that cannot take a Direct Object. "intransigent" = unlikely to forgive too easily or to ignore any mistake.
Subject-Transitive verb-Direct object.This pattern is one of the basic patterns and it would be hard to understand others if you do not understand this... so lets try giving an example:She wrote a lecture.Note that the word 'She' is italicized. The word 'She' is the Subject, and a subject is the word being described in a sentence, aka the 'DOER' of the action...She gave a lecture.The word 'gave' is in bold font... why? Because the word 'gave' is the transitive verb. A transitive verb, to make it simple, is a verb that could not stand alone or complete the sentence with it and the subject alone." She gave." Sounds silly, right? It is because this doesn't express a complete thought. She gave what? It must be completed by an object, right? This is the difference of a Transitive and an intransitive verb. "She gave" is incomplete while "She wrote" or "She ran" Is complete. These verbs no longer need an object although they too, may be used as transitive verbs at times. Rely on your stock knowledge or your understanding for that one.She gave a lecture.Now, the phrase "a lecture" is the direct object. Recall that a direct object is a noun that answers the question "What" or "Who" While an indirect object answers "For what" or "for whom"I believe that sums it up then. And the sentence is in S-TV-DO pattern if you didn't notice...Goodluck :D***anonymousschoolkid***
The explanation is that this sentence attempts to appear scholarly or scientific by avoiding simple declaration in favor of convolution, wordiness and mixed metaphor. If you meant " How the heck does this clunker work, anyway?" it goes like this: The subject is "they." The verb is "know." The direct object of the verb is the independent clause "too much complexity etc etc." That clause has a subject: "complexity" whose verb is "leaves" of which the direct object is "avenues" modified by the dependent clause "down which etc etc." That clause also has a subject "negotiation" and a verb "might meander" and the prepositional phrase "to its demise." In good English, the sentence would read something like: They know that keeping it simple will help the negotiation continue.
No, a sentence can only have one simple subject, which is the main noun or pronoun that the sentence is about. Additional nouns or pronouns in a sentence would typically be part of a compound subject.
The sentence "Even with both doors shut your CD player sounds too loud" is intransitive because it does not have a direct object. It describes an action (the CD player sounding too loud) without transferring that action to an object.
The word 'culture' is both a verb and a noun.The noun 'culture' can function as the subject of a sentence or a clause, and as the object of a verb or a preposition.A direct object is a noun or pronoun that receives the direct action of the verb.Examples:The culture shows evidence of a specific bacteria. (subject of the sentence)The bacteria that the culture produced is yet to be identified. (subject of the relative clause)A philanthropy group is bringing culture to the neighborhoods. (direct object of the verb 'is bringing')Money becomes too important in a culture of consumerism. (object of the preposition 'in')
The word 'culture' is both a verb and a noun.The noun 'culture' can function as the subject of a sentence or a clause, and as the object of a verb or a preposition.A direct object is a noun or pronoun that receives the direct action of the verb.Examples:The culture shows evidence of a specific bacteria. (subject of the sentence)The bacteria that the culture produced is yet to be identified. (subject of the relative clause)A philanthropy group is bringing culture to the neighborhoods. (direct object of the verb 'is bringing')Money becomes too important in a culture of consumerism. (object of the preposition 'in')
People would be the simple subject
Student
people
Maybe "intransitive"??? = a verb that cannot take a Direct Object. "intransigent" = unlikely to forgive too easily or to ignore any mistake.
Excerpts for "Animal Farm" by George Orwell (pronouns in bold):"And remember also that in fighting against Man, we must not come to resemble him. Even when you have conquered him, do not adopt hisvices.""No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves."The pronouns are:that, (relative pronoun) subject of the relative clausewe, (personal pronoun) subject of the second part of the compound sentencehim, (personal pronoun) direct object of the verb 'resemble'you, (personal pronoun) subject of the dependent clausehim, (personal pronoun) direct object of the verb 'conquered'his, (possessive adjective) describes the direct object noun 'vices'no one, (indefinite pronoun) subject of the sentencethat, (relative pronoun) subject of the relative clausehe, (personal pronoun) subject of the sentenceyou, (personal pronoun) direct object of the verb 'let'your, (possessive adjective) describes the direct object noun 'decisions'yourselves, (reflexive pronoun) reflects back to the subject antecedent 'you'
Subject-Transitive verb-Direct object.This pattern is one of the basic patterns and it would be hard to understand others if you do not understand this... so lets try giving an example:She wrote a lecture.Note that the word 'She' is italicized. The word 'She' is the Subject, and a subject is the word being described in a sentence, aka the 'DOER' of the action...She gave a lecture.The word 'gave' is in bold font... why? Because the word 'gave' is the transitive verb. A transitive verb, to make it simple, is a verb that could not stand alone or complete the sentence with it and the subject alone." She gave." Sounds silly, right? It is because this doesn't express a complete thought. She gave what? It must be completed by an object, right? This is the difference of a Transitive and an intransitive verb. "She gave" is incomplete while "She wrote" or "She ran" Is complete. These verbs no longer need an object although they too, may be used as transitive verbs at times. Rely on your stock knowledge or your understanding for that one.She gave a lecture.Now, the phrase "a lecture" is the direct object. Recall that a direct object is a noun that answers the question "What" or "Who" While an indirect object answers "For what" or "for whom"I believe that sums it up then. And the sentence is in S-TV-DO pattern if you didn't notice...Goodluck :D***anonymousschoolkid***
A noun functions as the subject of a sentence or a clause, and as the object of a verb or a preposition.Examples:The shout I heard came from behind the building. (subject of the sentence)The reaction that the shout produced was all heads turning. (subject of the relative clause)I heard the shout too. (direct object of the verb 'heard')We ran to look for the origin of the shout. (object of the preposition 'of')
Sorry. W-A-Y too broad a subject to be answered here. Entire textbooks are written on this subject.
The simple subject is a noun or a nominativepronoun. 'Your' is a possessive pronoun: out. Old is an adjective: out. 'Boots is a plural noun: BINGO!The simple predicate is a verb. 'Too' is an adverb: out. 'Tight' is an adjective: out. 'Now' is an adverb: out. 'Are' is a conjugation in the present tense of the verb to be: BINGO! Sift it all out and you have, Boots are. Enjoy the process!
The word 'euphemism' is a noun, a word for a mild or indirect word or expression substituted for one considered to be too harsh or blunt, unpleasant or embarrassing.A noun functions as the subject of a sentence or a clause, and as the object of a verb or a preposition.Examples:A euphemism can't minimize the fact that he is dead. (subject of the sentence)Caution, the word love can be a euphemism for ownership and control. (direct object of the verb 'can be')