Correct way: Joe finished his homework before going to bed. (subordinate clause: before going to bed)
Incorrect way: Joe finished his homework going to bed. (incorrect placing of the subordinate clause)
An independent clause without a subordinate clause is NOT a sentence fragment. It is an independent clause, therefore it can stand "independently," or alone.However, if you decide to use a subordinating clause, you will need to add a dependent clause because subordinating conjunctions (because, after, although, et al) are used to create a complex sentences(an independent + dependent clause).
The Captain is subordinate to a General in rank.Subordinate has a few meanings. It can mean below someone in status, e.g 'the peasant was subordinate to the King.'It has a similar meaning in that it can be used to describe someone who works for someone else, e.g 'the politician is subordinate to the Prime Minister.'Another use of subordinate is in 'subordinate clause,' which denotes a part of a sentence that adds to the main clause but cannot be used as a sentence in it's own right. For example, in the sentence 'The man rode quickly on his bike,' the subordinate clause would be 'on his bike,' because that is not a complete sentence.
A subordinate clause is a clause that can not stand alone as a complete sentence, because it does not express a complete thought
The word "that" is used in a sentence to introduce a clause that provides additional information or clarification. It can be used to connect ideas, indicate relationships between concepts, or to introduce a subordinate clause that adds more detail to the main clause.
You can use subordinate clauses, such as adverbial clauses or relative clauses, to connect ideas in your writing. These clauses provide additional information about the main clause and help to make the relationship between your ideas clear to the reader.
Yes, "at" can be the first word of a sentence for a grammatically correct sentence. Usually, at is used to start a subordinate clause. A subordinate clause is the part of a sentence that isn't correct all by itself. An example of a subordinate clause is "At my house". Notice that the previous sentence is a fragment. It is a subordinate clause. However when you add an independent clause, (the part of a sentence that is correct all by itself) you have a grammatically correct sentence. An example of a grammatically correct sentence that includes a subordinate clause is "At my house, my friend lost his tooth". In almost all cases, at can be used to start a sentence. Use your common sense or ask a teacher, etc. to find out when using "at" to start a sentence is incorrect. For your help, I will write some examples of when using "at" to start a sentence is correct, and when it is incorrect.Correct:-At a mountain I saw an experienced hiker climbing without safety equipment.-At soccer practice I scored a goal.Incorrect:-At the park. (Fragment)-At the football game.(While the two incorrect sentences could be used as answers to questions, they are fragments, which makes them grammatically incorrect.)Having trouble with my description of subordinate and independent clauses? I have given you some examples of both to clarify. The words in italics are the subordinate/independent clauses.Subordinate Clauses in Sentences:At a mountain I saw an experienced hiker climbing without safety equipment.The subordinate clause in the previous sentence was "At a mountain".Independent Clauses in Sentences:At a mountain I saw an experienced hiker climbing without safety equipment. The independent clause in the previous sentence was "I saw an experienced hiker climbing without safety equipment".Note that in most cases, English teachers would prefer the independent clause to be at the beginning of the sentence as this makes the sentence clearer to the reader.
An independent clause without a subordinate clause is NOT a sentence fragment. It is an independent clause, therefore it can stand "independently," or alone.However, if you decide to use a subordinating clause, you will need to add a dependent clause because subordinating conjunctions (because, after, although, et al) are used to create a complex sentences(an independent + dependent clause).
No, apostrophes are not used to create subordinate clauses. A subordinate clause is formed by combining a dependent clause with an independent clause, typically using subordinating conjunctions like "although," "because," or "if." Apostrophes are primarily used for contractions and to indicate possession, not for grammatical structures like clauses.
Use commas to separate clauses.
The Captain is subordinate to a General in rank.Subordinate has a few meanings. It can mean below someone in status, e.g 'the peasant was subordinate to the King.'It has a similar meaning in that it can be used to describe someone who works for someone else, e.g 'the politician is subordinate to the Prime Minister.'Another use of subordinate is in 'subordinate clause,' which denotes a part of a sentence that adds to the main clause but cannot be used as a sentence in it's own right. For example, in the sentence 'The man rode quickly on his bike,' the subordinate clause would be 'on his bike,' because that is not a complete sentence.
A subordinate clause is a clause that can not stand alone as a complete sentence, because it does not express a complete thought
A complex sentence is where u use a main clause and a subordinate clause example It was raining outside the trampoline was getting wer
Incorrect use.
Subordinate and independent clauses can be use in the following sentence: As it is quite cloudy today, we may have a downpour. In the sentence, 'As it is quite cloudy today' is a subordinate clause as it cannot stand alone, and 'we may have a downpour' is an independent clause which can stand on its own.
correct
The word "that" is used in a sentence to introduce a clause that provides additional information or clarification. It can be used to connect ideas, indicate relationships between concepts, or to introduce a subordinate clause that adds more detail to the main clause.
Yes, it is correct. You are correct to use "who" and not "whom" because "who" is the subject of the clause "who has sent him."