No.
You can put a comma before or after just about any word if the sentence structure requires it. If the sentence structure does not require it, it may be permissable to use a comma to assist in clarity and avoid confusion. Otherwise, don't use a comma. Have I confused you yet? Using a comma does not depend on the word, it depends on the structure of the sentence.
It is not proper to use a comma after the word "thanks" in the phrase "thanks again."
Not necessarily. Only use a comma when the final please is a request. For example, we say Do as you please; but Sit down, please.
No, a comma is not typically used before the word "apparently" at the end of a sentence.
You can put a comma before or after just about any word if the sentence structure requires it. If the sentence structure does not require it, it may be permissable to use a comma to assist in clarity and avoid confusion. Otherwise, don't use a comma. Have I confused you yet? Using a comma does not depend on the word, it depends on the structure of the sentence.
The use of a comma does not depend on the word, it depends on the sentence structure. At times a comma will follow 'which' and at other times it will not.
NO YOU DON'T PUT COMMA IN THE WORD THAT BECAUSE IT HAS A QUESTION MARK IN IT,AND THAT QUESTION MARK REPRESENT IT'S OWN FUNCTION.
When you are signing a gift card, and you want to say who it's from. Do you write "from, so-and-so"? Or do you omit the comma? Punctuation is not determined by the use of any particular word. It is determined by the structure of the sentence.
Example: It was hot, humid, and raining. In the example above, the comma after "humid" is unnecessary but acceptable. The use of the comma before 'and' is called the 'serial comma' or the 'Oxford comma', it's optional. Many people use the serial comma for clarity. The other use of a comma is to break up a long sentence, and signifies a slight pause. Example: He hit the ball, dropped the bat, and ran to first base.
It depends. a) If the phrase following the whose cannot stand without it, then do not use comma. Ex, Joe Santos, who is my uncle, knows everyone in town. b) If the phrase following the whose can stand alone without it, then use comma. Ex, Students who do failing work will not pass.
Not necessarily. It depends on the context. If you think in terms of placing a comma after a word, rather than before one, it might be helpful.
Yes, you would typically use a comma after the word "or" when it is used to separate two independent clauses. This helps to clarify the meaning and improve readability of the sentence.
Maybe. Maybe not. Sometimes. Othertimes not. Whether the use of a comma is or is not appropriate depends on the context.
No, a comma is not needed after that particular "well." If "well" is at the beginning of a sentence, such as in "Well, I am going to go now." it does need a comma after it. You must use a comma when beginning a sentence with "well." Because "well" is used as an introductory word, it must be followed by a comma. ------ the question is in regard to the phrase: "as well as" not for the word "well" i have consorted with my fellow grammarians and we concur that you would use a comma prior to "as well as" but not after as well.
no
It depends on how you use the word. If you use it as an adjective, pronoun, or conjuction, then it does not require a comma before it. For example, "Pull on either end of this string" (adjective); "There are two doors that lead to the exit; you can choose either" (pronoun); "Either say it now or come tomorrow" (conjunction). If you choose to use the word as an adverb, a comma is not necessarily required, but if you feel that you should pause before saying it, then add a comma. For example, "She didn't feel like she was qualified for it either" and "She didn't feel like she was qualified for it, either" are both acceptable, depending on if feel like you pause or not when saying it. Or more tersely: only when it begins a clause. Commas are a feature of sentence structure. There is no word in English that requires a comma.