Yes
Yes. Use an apostrophe S if you are indicating possession.
You put the apostrophe in children's between the n and the s. Children is plural for child. Since children is plural adding the apostrophe s makes it possessive.
there is no apostrophe in the word cyclist.
The hammer of neither doesn't require an apostrophe.
If this is someone's name, as I suspect it is, the apostrophe will go as such "Vikas's"
No, "hundreds" does not require an apostrophe when used in a plural form to indicate a quantity. An apostrophe is typically used to show possession or in contractions, but in this case, "hundreds" simply denotes multiple hundreds. For example, you would say "hundreds of people" without an apostrophe.
' it's ' meaning ' it is'. e.g. 'It's over there' ; 'It is over there'. However, ' its ' is in the plural form and no apostrophe.
Put the apostrophe in mices right after s.: mices'
No apostrophe is to be putted in this sentence.
Personally, no. But it's not incorrect to put the apostrophe.
"Volkswagen" doesn't require an apostrophe.
no matter what you usually have to put a period after an apostrophe because it's the end of a sentence.
'Are not' becomes ' aren't '. 'Aren't ' becomes further Americanised corruption to 'aint'. These are not good These aren't good. These aint good. ( Not the double negative of 'These aint no good'. It's like saying 'These are not not good'.
won't (:
I'd
we'll
No.