You should, most commonly, use present tense. A history essay, for example, would be an exception and would be in the past tense.
The past tense of "essay" is "essayed."
To is not a verb and does not have a past tense.
You can use "had to" to express obligation in the past.
you could use it in the future tense e.g i will be getting a hamster on saturday. for the past tense you would use been. for the present you could use something like doing
Past - there is nothing like that to use grammatically, but the natural replacement is 'Was'. Future - will be.
The past tense of "essay" is "essayed."
Usage of Past Tense or Present Tense is all depends on the topic.
You called Debbie.Did you call Debbie?You did not call Debbie.
Often, yes. History has already occurred, so it will usually go into the past tense. There are exceptions, like if a teacher wants it in present tense, or if you must write as if that event was current.
It is generally recommended to use past tense when discussing events or stories from the Bible, as they are considered to have taken place in the past. This maintains consistency in the narrative and adheres to traditional writing conventions.
You use the past tense form which is 'had'.
Past tense, because the writer read the famous story before writing about it.
Is can be used in the past tense if it's in its past tense form, which is was.
"is' is present tense. For past tense use was or were.
I used the past tense to answer this question.
The past tense is involved.
NO!!! It is the past tense of the verb 'to have'. Present tense I have You have He/she/they have Past Tense I Had You had He/she/they had Future Tense I shall have You will have He/she/they will have Not the use of 'shall/will'