Yes, "son's" with an apostrophe indicates possession or ownership.
If Mrs Washington has only one son with a new address and phone number, then:Mrs Washington had misplaced her son's new address and phone number. Between the son and s. Now If Mrs Washington has two or more sons each with a new address and phone number, then:Mrs Washington had misplaced her sons' new addresses and phone numbers. After the sons, and add the es to address and s to phone number. or: Mrs Washington had misplaced each one of her sons' new address and phone number. Again after the sons.
The apostrophe for "they had" is "they'd".
The sign for an apostrophe is '. It is used to indicate possession or contraction in written language.
The apostrophe in "they'd" stands for the missing letters in "they would" or "they had."
No, hers is already a possessive pronoun. No apostrophe is needed.
Sons would be plural and son's is possessive. Tickyul
If Mrs Washington has only one son with a new address and phone number, then:Mrs Washington had misplaced her son's new address and phone number. Between the son and s. Now If Mrs Washington has two or more sons each with a new address and phone number, then:Mrs Washington had misplaced her sons' new addresses and phone numbers. After the sons, and add the es to address and s to phone number. or: Mrs Washington had misplaced each one of her sons' new address and phone number. Again after the sons.
No. A spider is a spider and an apostrophe is an apostrophe.
you've is the apostrophe of you have
The apostrophe for "they had" is "they'd".
No, your doesn't have an apostrophe. You're, however, does have an apostrophe because it's a contraction for you and are.
This is an apostrophe.( ' )
With the apostrophe after the final S, the word indicates a plural possessive. "The team of the boys" rather than "the team of the boy".
No, taste doesn't have an apostrophe.
Can't is cannot with an apostrophe.
you dont use an apostrophe in will not
there is no apostrophe