answersLogoWhite

0

It depends on the usage of each one, so for example:

Jon was sick.

Jon has been sick.

The first sentence would usually be used for an action that is finished and with a time phrase that would indicate the past. eg

Jon was sick last week.


Jon has been sick.

This sentence could be used to indicate something that began in the past and still continues and with time markers for

or since

.

Jon has been sick for two weeks/since last week.

Or this sentence could be used to talk about a very recent event. eg

Jon has been sick! (two seconds ago).

Or this sentence could be used to talk about something that has finished in the past but the results are still noticeable. eg

A: Jon looks very pale.
B: Yes, Jon has been sick. (but he is not sick now)



User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Linguistics

What are the three dichotomies of linguistics?

The three main dichotomies of linguistics are: synchrony vs. diachrony (study of language at a specific point in time vs. over time), competence vs. performance (knowledge of language vs. its use in context), and langue vs. parole (language system vs. actual instances of language use).


How similar is the Danish language to German?

Not quite similar, but related.German is only similar to Danish in some degree (once you know it), but apart from some individual basic words ( being a Germanic language) and some more complex borrowed but now rather disguised words, Danish - along with its close relatives Swedish & Norwegian - is a rather different language than German. And therefore they are not mutually intelligible to the untrained ears, unless you have grown up in the border area and been exposed to both languages via TV for instance ( then you can easily see many cognates and likenesses in some parts of basic vocabulary ).German grammar is far more complex than that of Danish, which has been simplified along similar lines to those of English grammar.( e.g. same verb for every person & number, which E nearly has now for most verbs, and no special article for each case (only personal pronouns havecases! ) - genitive is the "same" as in E etc. )No akward "backward" subordinate clauses in Danish ( verb last! ), as in English, unlike in German.Basic Danish words are usually much closer to their English cognatesthan their German ditto - or the equivalent German words are completely unrelated.For instance:E D Ggive = give vs. gebentake = tage vs. nehmenhave = have vs. habenhope = håbe [ho-be!] vs. hoffehate = hade vs. hassenhold = hold(e) vs. haltengo = gå [go!] vs. gehencan = kan vs. könnenwill = vil vs. wollenshall = skal vs. sollenare (+am & is ) = er [air] vs. bin/ bist / ist / sind, seid/ sinddrink = drik(ke) vs. trinkensmile = smile [smeel-e] vs. lächlen ( ~ laugh)dream = drøm(me) [droem-me] = träumentree = træ vs. Baum (!)door = dør [doer] vs. Türwindow = vindue [vin-doo] vs. Fenster (!)father / mother / broder / sister / son / daughter =fader [fath-er!] / moder [moth-er!] / broder [broth-er!] /søster [soester], søn [soen], dattervs.Vater [fA-ter] / Mutter [moot-ter], Bruder [broo-der], Schwester (!),Son, Tochtereye = øje [oy-e! ] vs. Augeear = øre [oer-e] vs. Ohrcold = kold vs. kaltwarm = varm vs. warm (!)hot = hed vs. heissthirsty = tørstig [tirs-teegh] = durstichopen = åben[o-ben!] vs. "öffen"good = god vs. gutdeep = dyb vs. Tieflittle = lille vs. klein (!)already = allerede (!) vs. bereitsagain = igen [ee-gain] vs. weiderover = over vs. überunder = under vs. unterup = op [up!] vs. auffrom = fra vs. von / ausout = ud vs. aussafter = efter vs. nachI / me / my | mine = jeg [yaigh!] / mig / min vs. Ich / mich / meinhe / him / his / him = han / ham (!) / hans / ham vs. er / ihn / sein/ ihmwe / us / our(s) = vi [ve] / os [us!], vor(es) vs. wir, uns, unserthey, them , theirs = de [dee] / dem (!), deres (!) vs. Sie, ihn, seine


When to use were vs where in written grammar usage?

Were is the past tense of the word "been". Where on the other hand refers to a location. So the 2 words cannot be used interchangeably.


How to use Have been vs have being?

"Have been" is used in present perfect continuous tense to indicate that an action started in the past and is still ongoing. For example, "I have been working on this project for two hours." "Have being" is not a correct phrase in English grammar. Use "have been" in situations requiring present perfect continuous tense.


What are some Compare and contrast speech topics?

compare and contrast President bush speech after 9/11 and the pearl harbor speech by fdr....