I downloaded a new version of AVG last week it was version 9.0
What version of Windows do you use?
You would use 'me' in this case. You use 'I' when you are the subject of the sentence, and 'me' when you are the object of the sentence or the phrase, as in this case.Subject of sentence: I was going to get a picture.Object of phrase: I was going to get a picture of Kaeleah and me.Object of sentence: It was Kaeleah andme in the picture.
No. The correct version would be 'You went home'.
An easy sentence would be : " That foreigner is from India"
This sentence is a conditional sentence, specifically a past unreal conditional. It expresses a situation that did not happen in the past, as indicated by the use of "would have to."
No. There is no main verb, only a dependent clause. the grammar is totally wrong anurag
The Director's version of the movie was uncut, making it longer than the edited version.
You had not taken that into account. Would be the grammatically correct version of that sentence.
They encore with a superlative version of their latest hit.
I would use it correctly in a sentence, of course. Thank you for asking.
Jarry use paroxysm in a sentence.\
Would not that be "Would not that be?"?
I would use the word "theory" in a sentence like this: "The scientist presented a new theory to explain the findings of the experiment."
How would you like me to put that in a sentence?
reassuring sentence
elan in a sentence
You would use 'me' in this case. You use 'I' when you are the subject of the sentence, and 'me' when you are the object of the sentence or the phrase, as in this case.Subject of sentence: I was going to get a picture.Object of phrase: I was going to get a picture of Kaeleah and me.Object of sentence: It was Kaeleah andme in the picture.
I can answer it for you.