Yes, Burmese is a tonal language, meaning that the pitch or tone in which a word is spoken can change its meaning.
No, Spanish is not a tonal language. Tonal languages use pitch to distinguish meaning, while Spanish relies on stress and intonation.
Yes, Khmer is a tonal language, meaning that the pitch or tone in which a word is spoken can change its meaning.
Yes, Thai is a tonal language, meaning that the tone or pitch at which a word is spoken can change its meaning.
Yes, Vietnamese is a tonal language, meaning that the pitch or tone in which a word is spoken can change its meaning.
No, English is not a tonal language. Tonal languages use pitch variations to distinguish meaning, while English relies more on word order and stress patterns.
No, Spanish is not a tonal language. Tonal languages use pitch to distinguish meaning, while Spanish relies on stress and intonation.
W H Sloan has written: 'A practical method with the Burmese language' -- subject(s): Burmese, Burmese language, Dictionaries, English, English language
Yes, Khmer is a tonal language, meaning that the pitch or tone in which a word is spoken can change its meaning.
Yes, Thai is a tonal language, meaning that the tone or pitch at which a word is spoken can change its meaning.
Yes, Vietnamese is a tonal language, meaning that the pitch or tone in which a word is spoken can change its meaning.
No, English is not a tonal language. Tonal languages use pitch variations to distinguish meaning, while English relies more on word order and stress patterns.
Burmese language
Burmese
U Khin has written: 'Spoken Burmese' -- subject(s): Burmese language, Spoken Burmese
Japanese is not a tonal language; rather, it has two pitches -- "high" and "low". Other and that, it does not use tones to distinguish words as in Chinese.
No, it is not. In fact, in all of Europe, only the following languages have tonal characteristics:SwedishNorwegianSerbo-CroatianSloveneLithuanianLatvianLimburgishLuxembourgish
messed up language jibber jabber