Yes, Burmese is a tonal language, meaning that the pitch or tone in which a word is spoken can change its meaning.
No, Spanish is not a tonal language. Tonal languages use pitch to distinguish meaning, while Spanish relies on stress and intonation.
Yes, Khmer is a tonal language, meaning that the pitch or tone in which a word is spoken can change its meaning.
Yes, Thai is a tonal language, meaning that the tone or pitch at which a word is spoken can change its meaning.
Yes, Vietnamese is a tonal language, meaning that the pitch or tone in which a word is spoken can change its meaning.
No, English is not a tonal language. Tonal languages use pitch variations to distinguish meaning, while English relies more on word order and stress patterns.
No, Spanish is not a tonal language. Tonal languages use pitch to distinguish meaning, while Spanish relies on stress and intonation.
W H Sloan has written: 'A practical method with the Burmese language' -- subject(s): Burmese, Burmese language, Dictionaries, English, English language
Yes, Khmer is a tonal language, meaning that the pitch or tone in which a word is spoken can change its meaning.
Yes, Thai is a tonal language, meaning that the tone or pitch at which a word is spoken can change its meaning.
Yes, Vietnamese is a tonal language, meaning that the pitch or tone in which a word is spoken can change its meaning.
No, English is not a tonal language. Tonal languages use pitch variations to distinguish meaning, while English relies more on word order and stress patterns.
Burmese language
Burmese
Japanese is not a tonal language; rather, it has two pitches -- "high" and "low". Other and that, it does not use tones to distinguish words as in Chinese.
U Khin has written: 'Spoken Burmese' -- subject(s): Burmese language, Spoken Burmese
No, it is not. In fact, in all of Europe, only the following languages have tonal characteristics:SwedishNorwegianSerbo-CroatianSloveneLithuanianLatvianLimburgishLuxembourgish
messed up language jibber jabber