Yes. It means "say for the third time."
While "repeat again" is commonly used in everyday language, it is considered redundant because "repeat" already implies doing something again. It is better to simply say "repeat" or "do it again" for clarity and to avoid redundancy.
This is not grammatically correct. The correct form is 'you do not know', or the abbreviated 'you don't know'.
Sure. It would also be grammatically correct to write He spoggled his nubbix on the goober. Grammatically correct and meaningful are not the same.
The phrase "Is you don't miss me do you" is not grammatically correct. It should be rephrased to something like "Don't you miss me?" to be correct.
No, it is not grammatically correct. The correct way to say it is "your older sister."
While "repeat again" is commonly used in everyday language, it is considered redundant because "repeat" already implies doing something again. It is better to simply say "repeat" or "do it again" for clarity and to avoid redundancy.
Unless you are referring to it for the THIRD time, use "repeat." Iterate already means "repeat" and so re-iterate means repeat again.
That is the correct spelling of the verb "repeat" (to do or say again).
I felt moved once again
The correct spelling is "repeat." (to do again)
Yes, 'for free', is grammatically correct.
"Not like that" can be grammatically correct, depending on the context.
Yes! That is grammatically correct!
This is not grammatically correct. The correct form is 'you do not know', or the abbreviated 'you don't know'.
'What a drunkard you are' is a grammatically correct English sentence.
"That was wrong" is a grammatically correct sentence.
Yes, it is grammatically correct.