Yes.
It has a subject = she
it has a verb = slayed
it has an object = dragon
Actually it is slew. Slayed is a slang word and is not grammatically correct.
No, "He slew the dragon" is grammatically correct. "Slew" is the simple past form of "slay," meaning to kill. So, the sentence means "He killed the dragon."
"I have slain the dragon" is grammatically correct. "Slew" is the simple past tense form of "slay," while "slain" is the past participle form used with the auxiliary verb "have."
This is not grammatically correct. The correct form is 'you do not know', or the abbreviated 'you don't know'.
Sure. It would also be grammatically correct to write He spoggled his nubbix on the goober. Grammatically correct and meaningful are not the same.
No. It is: "The knight slayed the dragon".
The correct spelling is slayed. The warrior slayed the dragon. The hunter slayed his prey.
Actually it is slew. Slayed is a slang word and is not grammatically correct.
No, "He slew the dragon" is grammatically correct. "Slew" is the simple past form of "slay," meaning to kill. So, the sentence means "He killed the dragon."
"I have slain the dragon" is grammatically correct. "Slew" is the simple past tense form of "slay," while "slain" is the past participle form used with the auxiliary verb "have."
Hercules
"Not like that" can be grammatically correct, depending on the context.
Yes! That is grammatically correct!
Yes, 'for free', is grammatically correct.
This is not grammatically correct. The correct form is 'you do not know', or the abbreviated 'you don't know'.
'What a drunkard you are' is a grammatically correct English sentence.
"That was wrong" is a grammatically correct sentence.