0
Nope! It's a preposition.
1. Prepositional phrases that feature "without" can modify nouns. e.g.
"A lizard without legs is still not technically a snake."
2. Prepositional phrases that feature "without" can be adverbial. e.g.
"Without that evidence, we can't go to trial."
3. When a prepositional phrase introduces a clause, that clause must be a noun phrase, specifically a nominalization or gerund clause. e.g.
"I'd like to go to a party without Harry('s) inviting himself to ride with us."
"Try to tell her the truth without making her angry."
What else can I help you with?
Is whoever a conjunction?
No, it is not a conjunction. It is a pronoun, like who. It can introduce a noun clause (e.g. whoever we choose).
is undoubtedly a conjunction?
No, it is not a conjunction. It is an adjective meaning surely, "without doubt or question."
Is without a subordinating conjunction?
Yes, it can be, but only in certain dialects where it can mean UNLESS. Otherwise, it is a preposition, and lacking an object is an adverb (e.g. to go without).
This results when two or more independent clauses are joined by a comma without a coordinating conjunction?
This is known as a comma splice. It is considered a punctuation error as it incorrectly joins two independent clauses without a coordinating conjunction or appropriate punctuation. To correct a comma splice, you can either use a semicolon, separate the clauses into two sentences, or add a coordinating conjunction like "and," "but," or "or."
Is it to correct to say in conjunction to or in conjunction with?
The correct and commonly accepted phrase is “in conjunction with.” “In conjunction to” is generally considered incorrect in standard English.
Is between a conjunction?
No, it is not a conjunction. It is a preposition (used with an object) or an adverb (without an object).
Is whoever a conjunction?
No, it is not a conjunction. It is a pronoun, like who. It can introduce a noun clause (e.g. whoever we choose).
is undoubtedly a conjunction?
No, it is not a conjunction. It is an adjective meaning surely, "without doubt or question."
Is without a subordinating conjunction?
Yes, it can be, but only in certain dialects where it can mean UNLESS. Otherwise, it is a preposition, and lacking an object is an adverb (e.g. to go without).
Is also a verb?
No. Also is an adverb. It means "in addition." It can also (arguably) function as a conjunction without "and."
Is it to correct to say in conjunction to or in conjunction with?
The correct and commonly accepted phrase is “in conjunction with.” “In conjunction to” is generally considered incorrect in standard English.
This results when two or more independent clauses are joined by a comma without a coordinating conjunction?
This is known as a comma splice. It is considered a punctuation error as it incorrectly joins two independent clauses without a coordinating conjunction or appropriate punctuation. To correct a comma splice, you can either use a semicolon, separate the clauses into two sentences, or add a coordinating conjunction like "and," "but," or "or."
What word implies that eternity is abundant and without end?
Your question contains your answer.... "Eternity," implies without end. -Forever, or infinity can be used in conjunction with "eternity"
Is about a preposition adverb or conjunction?
"About" can function as a preposition when it is used to indicate a topic or subject. For example, "We're talking about grammar." It can also be an adverb when used to convey approximation, as in "It's about 5 kilometers away."
Is there any sentence without preposition or conjunction?
A sentence requires only a subject and predicate, that is, a noun and a verb, as in I ran; Mary cried; horses neigh. Therefore, there are many sentences with neither preposition nor conjunction.
Is if a conjunction or not?
Yes, it is a subordinating conjunction. It connects a restrictive clause.
Is Wow a conjunction?
No, "wow" is not a conjunction. It's an interjection.
