Not necessarily. For example: I was walking down the street when I saw a man who needed help. Three clauses, no commas.
Yes, a comma is generally needed when a subordinate clause begins with a subordinate conjunction. The comma is used to separate the subordinate clause from the main clause.
A responsible subordinate is someone who follows directions, meets deadlines, and takes ownership of their work. They communicate effectively, ask questions when needed, and seek feedback to improve their performance. They are reliable, trustworthy, and accountable for their actions.
The short answer: you don't need one.The long answer:Which is a subordinating conjunction, meaning that when it starts a clause, it makes a dependent clause which is an incomplete sentence.Grammar dictates the following comma placement in the pairing of clauses:(Independent Clause = IC, Dependent Clause = DC) IC DC or DC, ICSince which will start a dependent clause, provided that you put the independent clause first, you need not place a comma on behalf of the word which. If, however, the dependent clause goes first, you must place a comma after the entire clause, not just the word which.
You use a comma with because when you are using it as the beginning of a dependent clause or modifying clause. For exampleBecause Latoya was allergic to shrimp, Laquetta opted to make steak for the dinner party.orUncle Joe, because of his demetia, accidentally confused me with the grim reaper, subsequently opting to throw a bag of potato chips at my head.BECAUSE IS NOT A CONJUCTION...CONSEQUENTLY IT SHOULD NEVER BE USED AS ONE. THESE ARE THE TWO GENERALLY ACCEPTED USES FOR COMMAS AND BECAUSE.In fact, it's easier to just remember that you NEVER use a comma before the word "because". In the example above, the comma follows the dependent clause. It does not precede it and never should. "Because" ALWAYS introduces a dependent clause and should NEVER have a comma before it. Here's the rule: Independent clause + dependent clause = no comma.Dependent clause + independent clause = comma AFTER the dependent clause.
The comma goes before "and". However, this is only when "and" is followed by an independent clause. The comma is not needed for dependent clauses.
Yes, a comma is generally needed when a subordinate clause begins with a subordinate conjunction. The comma is used to separate the subordinate clause from the main clause.
Yes, a comma is needed after "why" if it is used to introduce a subordinate clause. For example: "I don't understand why he left, it doesn't make sense to me."
The simplest sentence consists of only a subject and a predicate (a noun and a verb) and is only one clause."Scott ran." is an example of such a sentence. It has one noun (Scott), one verb (ran), and is an independent clause (it stands alone as a sentence).A slightly more complex sentence can have two clauses as is evidenced by the following modification to the earlier example:"Scott ran, and he made it in time." The original sentence now contains two clauses (an independent one and a subordinate one).In general, though, "simple sentence" usually refers to a sentence with only one clause.
A responsible subordinate is someone who follows directions, meets deadlines, and takes ownership of their work. They communicate effectively, ask questions when needed, and seek feedback to improve their performance. They are reliable, trustworthy, and accountable for their actions.
Leave some cookies and milk on Christmas Eve. Hopefully he will arrive.
The short answer: you don't need one.The long answer:Which is a subordinating conjunction, meaning that when it starts a clause, it makes a dependent clause which is an incomplete sentence.Grammar dictates the following comma placement in the pairing of clauses:(Independent Clause = IC, Dependent Clause = DC) IC DC or DC, ICSince which will start a dependent clause, provided that you put the independent clause first, you need not place a comma on behalf of the word which. If, however, the dependent clause goes first, you must place a comma after the entire clause, not just the word which.
You use a comma with because when you are using it as the beginning of a dependent clause or modifying clause. For exampleBecause Latoya was allergic to shrimp, Laquetta opted to make steak for the dinner party.orUncle Joe, because of his demetia, accidentally confused me with the grim reaper, subsequently opting to throw a bag of potato chips at my head.BECAUSE IS NOT A CONJUCTION...CONSEQUENTLY IT SHOULD NEVER BE USED AS ONE. THESE ARE THE TWO GENERALLY ACCEPTED USES FOR COMMAS AND BECAUSE.In fact, it's easier to just remember that you NEVER use a comma before the word "because". In the example above, the comma follows the dependent clause. It does not precede it and never should. "Because" ALWAYS introduces a dependent clause and should NEVER have a comma before it. Here's the rule: Independent clause + dependent clause = no comma.Dependent clause + independent clause = comma AFTER the dependent clause.
The noun clause is 'what you needed to buy at the store', which is the direct object of the verb 'knew'.
The comma goes before "and". However, this is only when "and" is followed by an independent clause. The comma is not needed for dependent clauses.
A comma is typically placed before the word "but" when it is connecting two independent clauses. If "but" is used to connect two elements within a single clause, a comma is not needed.
If it is used as what is termed an "interrupter," you use a comma. If it is joining two clauses, you use a semicolon before it and a comma after it. Interrupter: He would, therefore, appreciate a quick response. Joining clauses: He appreciates quick responses; therefore, I shall endeavour to provide them without delay.
The sentence "The family needed food" is a simple sentence, as it contains a single independent clause with a subject and a verb. The sentence "The family needed other supplies" is also a simple sentence for the same reason. If you combine both sentences, you could create a compound sentence: "The family needed food, and they needed other supplies."