Yes, here is an example.
The table was covered with roasted chicken, mashed potatoes, corn, etc.
If a sentence consists of two independent clauses with a comma between them, it is a comma splice. That is, the part before the comma can stand on its own as a sentence, and the part after the comma can also stand on its own as a sentence, then it is a comma splice. If there is no punctuation there instead of a comma, it is known as a run-on sentence.
Yes. Example: They used many different building materials including wood, metal, stone, etc. Not necessarily. There is no word or phrase in English that requires a comma before or after it.
No. Usually in a list there is/are no comma(s). The list would instead go something like this: Mum's Shopping List: #Bread #milk #soup etc, etc.
It depends on the sentence, but you generally place it before. Here's an example: "White light contains all other light spectra, including blue, red, green, etc..." An example of a sentence in which you would place a comma both before and after is "White light contains all other light spectra, including, but not limited to blue, red and green." See the related links for more information.
As with a comma, a semi-colon (;) separates items (i.e., a list or set of ideas, etc.) within a given sentence. Therefore, it is one sentence.
No.
No comma is necessary before "Jr.", "Sr.", and the like. No comma has ever been necessary before "III", "IV", etc. From the Chicago Manual of Style (http://ow.ly/gcv0):But please note that within text, if you decide to use the more traditional comma before Jr. or Sr., the function of the comma is to set off these abbreviations, so an additional comma is needed after the abbreviation if the sentence continues (as in my first sentence above).
If a sentence consists of two independent clauses with a comma between them, it is a comma splice. That is, the part before the comma can stand on its own as a sentence, and the part after the comma can also stand on its own as a sentence, then it is a comma splice. If there is no punctuation there instead of a comma, it is known as a run-on sentence.
Twice, with a comma before and between, like this: The frumpy lecturer went boringly on and on ad infinitum and even beyond, etc, etc.
Yes. Example: They used many different building materials including wood, metal, stone, etc. Not necessarily. There is no word or phrase in English that requires a comma before or after it.
If you mean "do we use a comma before 'etc.'?", then yes we do. Remember to take some paper, a pen, etc. (Oxford ALD).
No. Usually in a list there is/are no comma(s). The list would instead go something like this: Mum's Shopping List: #Bread #milk #soup etc, etc.
"Etc" will usually come at the end of a list, so no. I believe that it is optional to put a period after it if it is not at the end of a sentence.
It depends on the sentence, but you generally place it before. Here's an example: "White light contains all other light spectra, including blue, red, green, etc..." An example of a sentence in which you would place a comma both before and after is "White light contains all other light spectra, including, but not limited to blue, red and green." See the related links for more information.
Not necessarily. There is no word or phrase in English that requires a comma. More importantly, however, avoid contractions and abbreviations in formal writing. Instead, use " and so forth," or " and the rest."Typically, the abbreviation etc. is used to denote the continuation of a series. As the elements of a series are separated by commas, then yes, a comma is called for in front of etc. For example, in the sentence below:I like all sorts of fruit: blueberries, strawberries, watermelon, etc.
As with a comma, a semi-colon (;) separates items (i.e., a list or set of ideas, etc.) within a given sentence. Therefore, it is one sentence.
No, because and and etc are never used together. Etc already means "and the rest."