Yes, "costed" is a correct past tense and past participle form of the verb "cost." It is used to indicate the price or expense of something. For example, "The project was costed at $10,000."
"Have been" is the correct phrase to use. "Have being" is not grammatically correct.
The correct phrase is "you had to leave." "Leave" is the correct verb form to use after "had to."
use "she didn't have to". "she didn't has to" is ungrammatical
The correct phrase to use depends on the context of the sentence. "To be" is used as an infinitive verb phrase, while "to being" is not grammatically correct in standard English. For example, "I like to be alone" is correct, while "I like to being alone" is not.
"He and I met yesterday" is correct. Subjects use the nominative case (I, we, he, she) while objects use the objective case (me, us, him, her).
use 11 left 19
it costed as much as it costed
No, costed is not a real word, the past tense of cost is just cost.
“what kinde of cars are avalable in baghdad costed about $10000”
The land and everything costed $40,948,900. The Building itself costed $24,718,000.
I think "cost" is one of those weird words that is the same in past & present tense. Hence: It cost billions of dollars.
Andrea Amati's "best" violin out of all, costed approximately $250,000,000. His others costed about $100,000,000.
its hard to say because a flight that costed $75 in the '60s, would have costed $574 today. If we use a typical cost for airfare today, like $300 back in the '60s, it would have been equivalent to $2,296 today. Wow!
bread costed just about 2.00 per pound in 1990 bread costed just about 2.00 per pound in 1990
It costed $20,567,834.
It Costed £390Million
It Costed 2.00