No, not every deterministic context-free language is regular. While regular languages are a subset of deterministic context-free languages, there are deterministic context-free languages that are not regular. This is because deterministic context-free languages can include more complex structures that cannot be captured by regular expressions.
Arabic is the official language in every North African country.
No, the term "hellilula" is not the same in every language. It is not a universally recognized word and may have different meanings or translations depending on the language.
No, not every language has its own sign language. Sign languages are unique and separate from spoken languages, and different countries may have their own sign languages.
Arabic is an official language in North African countries.
Yes, numbers look the same in every language as they are represented by the same symbols (0-9) universally.
No, not every finite language is regular.
Yes, it is true that every finite language is regular.
The reverse of a regular language is regular because for every string in the original language, there exists a corresponding string in the reversed language that is also regular. This is because regular languages are closed under the operation of reversal, meaning that if a language is regular, its reverse will also be regular.
Push Down Automata (PDA) are a way to represent the language class called Context Free Languages(CFLs). PDA are abstract devices defined in automata theory. They are similar to Finite Automata(FA), except that they have access to a potentially unlimited amoun of memeory in the form of a single stack. PDA are of two types Deterministic and Non-Deterministic. Every PDA excepts a Formal Language. The language accepted by non-deterministic PDA are precisly the CFLs. If we allow a finite automaton to access two stack instead of just one, we obtain a device much more powerful than a PDA, equivalent to a Turing Machine(TM).
Kleen's theorem states that for every deterministic finite automaton (DFA), there exists a regular expression that describes the same language accepted by that DFA. To derive a regular expression from a DFA, one can systematically eliminate states while maintaining equivalence to the original DFA, replacing transitions with regular expressions that capture the paths between states. This process continues until only the start and accept states remain, yielding a regular expression that represents the language of the DFA. The theorem highlights the relationship between finite automata and regular expressions, emphasizing their interchangeable nature in representing regular languages.
Hi, 1. DFA cannot use empty string transition and NFS can use empty string transition. 2. It use one machine but it use multiple machine. 3. DFA is one state transition but NFA react according to some symbol.
No not every quadrilateral can be a regular polygon.
Yes every square is a regular polygon.
Algorithm is deterministic if for a given input the output generated is same for a function. A mathematical function is deterministic. Hence the state is known at every step of the algorithm.Algorithm is non deterministic if there are more than one path the algorithm can take. Due to this, one cannot determine the next state of the machine running the algorithm. Example would be a random function.FYI,Non deterministic machines that can't solve problems in polynomial time are NP. Hence finding a solution to an NP problem is hard but verifying it can be done in polynomial time. Hope this helps.Pl correct me if I am wrong here.Thank you.Sharada
There are no sounds found in every language.
The expression for something that occurs every 3 weeks can be stated as "occurs biweekly" or "occurs every three weeks." In a calendar context, it can also be described as "recurring every 21 days." This indicates a regular interval of time between occurrences.
"In every language" makes this question impossible to answer.