No. "Of a city" needs to modify a preceding noun, and "northern" is an adjective, rather than being a noun. But "northern part of a city" or "north of a city" would both be okay, because "part" and "north" can be nouns.
I don't understand why "of a city" needs to modify a preceding noun, however (if that is really true). In some other examples, a prepositional phrase with "of" can go with a preceding adjective -- for instance in "desirous of being chosen".
I have to HAVE it cleaned.I had to HAVE it cleaned.
No, it's not correct grammar. The correct way to say it is: "was able to confirm"
No, it is not proper grammar. The correct phrasing is "you and I."
No, the correct grammar would be "Look at what you got."
Yes, 'you were correct' is perfect grammar. An example sentence: You were correct when you said that a tomato is a fruit.
Yes, that is correct grammar.
I have to HAVE it cleaned.I had to HAVE it cleaned.
This should say, The next stop will be somewhere in Vasayas, then it will be correct grammar. Written as it is it is not on correct grammar.
No, it is not correct
No, it's not correct grammar. The correct way to say it is: "was able to confirm"
No, it is not proper grammar. The correct phrasing is "you and I."
No, the correct grammar would be "Look at what you got."
Absolutely.
Yes
Yes, 'you were correct' is perfect grammar. An example sentence: You were correct when you said that a tomato is a fruit.
No, The correct grammar for this sentence would be, "He finished doing his homework."
Yes, it is correct to say out of compliance with. It means out of help with in English grammar.