No. With things that may be counted we use "fewer."
Both are correct as they are both in the Present Perfect.
The sentence is incorrect as it lacks the proper punctuation. A better sentence would be "I spent less today and I'm happy I was able to save money, even just for one day".
In this sentence, a more correct version would be "the war is over" or "the war has ended."
We have no idea what you're saying.Does that help?Okay, we have some idea. But we're not certain. Using correct grammar and spelling tends to remove ambiguities, because if the grammar and spelling aren't correct, we have to make guesses about what you're really trying to ask, what the misspelled words are actually supposed to be (sometimes it's obvious; other times it's less so) and what words you left out and where they should be inserted.
A context-free grammar can generate languages that regular grammars cannot, as it allows for the use of non-terminal symbols in productions. Regular grammars, on the other hand, are less powerful and can only generate regular languages, which are a subset of context-free languages. Context-free grammars are more expressive and have more flexibility in rule definitions compared to regular grammars.
Correct answer: Less than 1%.
Both are correct as they are both in the Present Perfect.
The sentence is incorrect as it lacks the proper punctuation. A better sentence would be "I spent less today and I'm happy I was able to save money, even just for one day".
Twenty is 930 less than 950. Twenty percent of 950 is 190. Twenty is much less than 950.
In this sentence, a more correct version would be "the war is over" or "the war has ended."
No, some have less than twenty, and some have more than twenty.
Yes, twenty three is less than twenty eight.
21.2
seven twenty fourths is LESS THAN five sixteenths.
Let's see . . . -- "Three tenths" is less than one. -- "Twenty-four and etc." is more than twenty-four. The first one looks like less. The second one looks like more.
Greater.
23.9