no. the plural for reef is reefer.
no the plural of tooth is teeth....u would say four teeth
The only correct plural for French is French. "Frenches", as you say, or 'Frenchies' is a derogatory slang term.
no minutes is plural so is should be are here are the minutes
No, it would be correct to say "two visits were completed" because "visits" is plural in this sentence.
It is correct to say "salmon don't leap" because "salmon" is a plural noun, so it should be paired with "don't," which is the plural form of the verb "to leap."
there is no plural for of don't in correct English you have to say does not
no the plural of tooth is teeth....u would say four teeth
The only correct plural for French is French. "Frenches", as you say, or 'Frenchies' is a derogatory slang term.
The correct form is the nominative plural "Boys."
No geeses is not a word the correct way to say it is geese eggs
Correct plural of lumen is lumina. (From the latin). However, people seem to accept lumens these days. For example, the correct plural of formula is formulae, but people tend to say formulas.
No. For plural, like are, you can say have been. For singular you would say has been.
No.Floods is a plural noun and has is the singular form of the verb have. Subject and verb must agree so the plural subject (floods) must have a plural verb - have.The floods have = correct
no minutes is plural so is should be are here are the minutes
No, it would be correct to say "two visits were completed" because "visits" is plural in this sentence.
Most people say it is genii...That should be correct though...
Some is plural so "are" is correct. The answer is Barukhashem