Yes, as the object of a verb or a preposition: I saw Bob; I saw her; I saw Bob and her. Some people think "her and Bob" sounds better, but it is not any more correct.
There is nothing wrong grammatically with the construction 'Bob and her' as the object of a verb. Whether it sounds better or worse than 'her and Bob' is a question of usage or taste, not of grammar.
Correct grammar is Bob and I but most people use causal grammer and you and Bob is OK.
I have to HAVE it cleaned.I had to HAVE it cleaned.
No, it's not correct grammar. The correct way to say it is: "was able to confirm"
No, it is not proper grammar. The correct phrasing is "you and I."
No, the correct grammar would be "Look at what you got."
Correct grammar is Bob and I but most people use causal grammer and you and Bob is OK.
No. You are omitting the words "it is" as in "It is great to see you and Bob."
It depends on the structure of the entire sentence. For example, "Bill, Bob, and I are going to the grocery store" is correct grammar in that sentence, but "Sandra is going to meet Bill, Bob, and me" is also grammatically correct because of the structure of its sentence. It really all depends upon the context in which the phrase "Bill, Bob, and I" are being put into. == ==
Yes, that is correct grammar.
I have to HAVE it cleaned.I had to HAVE it cleaned.
No, it is not correct
This should say, The next stop will be somewhere in Vasayas, then it will be correct grammar. Written as it is it is not on correct grammar.
No, it's not correct grammar. The correct way to say it is: "was able to confirm"
No, it is not proper grammar. The correct phrasing is "you and I."
No, the correct grammar would be "Look at what you got."
Yes
Absolutely.