No, it cannot be a conjunction. Mostly is an adverb.
The correct and commonly accepted phrase is “in conjunction with.” “In conjunction to” is generally considered incorrect in standard English.
Yes, it is a subordinating conjunction. It connects a restrictive clause.
There is no conjunction of will not.Maybe you mean contraction.If you do then won't is the contraction
No, it is not a conjunction. It is a contraction. It combines the pronoun YOU and the verb ARE.
No, it is not a conjunction. The pronoun-verb pair "you are" can be replaced by a contraction: the contraction you're.
The sea erodes its coasts, mostly by the violent process of waves action, in conjunction with tides and ocean currents.
The sea erodes its coasts, mostly by the violent process of waves action, in conjunction with tides and ocean currents.
The correct and commonly accepted phrase is “in conjunction with.” “In conjunction to” is generally considered incorrect in standard English.
It is a conjunction.
No, "wow" is not a conjunction. It's an interjection.
Yes, it is a subordinating conjunction. It connects a restrictive clause.
There is no conjunction of will not.Maybe you mean contraction.If you do then won't is the contraction
The word are is not a conjunction. It is a verb.
No, it is not a conjunction. The word be is a verb.
no better is not a conjunction
It can be a conjunction, as well as an adverb. As a subordinating conjunction, it connects restrictive dependent clauses.
No, it is not a conjunction. It is a contraction. It combines the pronoun YOU and the verb ARE.