Yes
The continuous tense and the progressive tense are the same thing. To make the continuous future tense you use the following structure: subject + WILL + BE + Verb. For example, I will be running.
Present perfect progressive and present perfect continuous refer to the same tense and are often used interchangeably. Both tenses indicate an action that started in the past and is ongoing or has just been completed. The choice between "progressive" and "continuous" is mainly a matter of dialect or personal preference.
Assuming that "past continuous" means the same thing as "past progressive", the answer is "was thinking".
There is:present simple -- I like ice cream -- has one verb (like) in the present tense.andpresent progressive -- I am eating ice cream -- has two verbs, a be verb (am) this tells us the sentence is present and a present participle (eating).So present and present progressive are not the same.
Did not do it -> did not do it (same past tense form)
The continuous tense and the progressive tense are the same thing. To make the continuous future tense you use the following structure: subject + WILL + BE + Verb. For example, I will be running.
Present perfect progressive and present perfect continuous refer to the same tense and are often used interchangeably. Both tenses indicate an action that started in the past and is ongoing or has just been completed. The choice between "progressive" and "continuous" is mainly a matter of dialect or personal preference.
Assuming that "past continuous" means the same thing as "past progressive", the answer is "was thinking".
They're the same thing - the 'simple' is usually just missed out.Other forms of the past tense are:Past PerfectPast ContinuousPast Perfect Continuous
The sentences, "I might be washing my hair later" and "You will come around, won't you" do not use either of the tenses mentioned in the question. "Might be washing" could be called a "conditional future progressive*" tense, while "will come" and "won't" are both in simple future tense. *"Progressive", which I learned fifty years ago, may mean the same thing as "continuous" when used as part of a name of a tense.
There is:present simple -- I like ice cream -- has one verb (like) in the present tense.andpresent progressive -- I am eating ice cream -- has two verbs, a be verb (am) this tells us the sentence is present and a present participle (eating).So present and present progressive are not the same.
Did not do it -> did not do it (same past tense form)
The word "that" is not a verb and does not have a past tense form.
No they are not the same but the past perfect tense uses the past participle.
The present tense of "finally" is "finally." This word remains the same in present tense as it is an adverb indicating the conclusion of something or when something is done after a long time.
The same as "present progressive". The tense is formed by combining the appropriate present tense form of "be" to agree with subject with the present participle of the other verb, and it indicates action or state of being continuing from at least the recent past through the present and into at least the immediate future. Example: "He is running fast", when one sees a runner in a race.
No they are not the same. Future can be formed with will / going to or present continuous (progressive).will + verb -- I will see you tomorrow.be + going to + verb -- I am going to see her tomorrow.be + present participle -- I am seeing her tomorrow.These are the most common ways of talking about the future.Future progressive is:will + be + present participle. This is probably the least common way of talking about the future:I'll be talking to her next week.