No, it is not a conjunction. It is an adverb.
No, "recently" is an adverb, not a subordinating conjunction. Subordinating conjunctions are words like "because," "although," and "if" that join dependent clauses to an independent clause in a sentence. "Recently" does not perform this function.
The correct and commonly accepted phrase is “in conjunction with.” “In conjunction to” is generally considered incorrect in standard English.
Yes, it is a subordinating conjunction. It connects a restrictive clause.
There is no conjunction of will not.Maybe you mean contraction.If you do then won't is the contraction
No, it is not a conjunction. It is a contraction. It combines the pronoun YOU and the verb ARE.
No, "recently" is an adverb, not a subordinating conjunction. Subordinating conjunctions are words like "because," "although," and "if" that join dependent clauses to an independent clause in a sentence. "Recently" does not perform this function.
It's marketing in conjunction with PETA - People Eating Tasty Animals.
The Latin word 'modo' can be used as both an adverb and a conjunction. As an adverb 'modo' means 'just now,' 'recently' or 'only just.' As a conjunction it means 'but' or 'but only.' The exact definition can be determined by the conjugation of the world and the context of the sentence.
The correct and commonly accepted phrase is “in conjunction with.” “In conjunction to” is generally considered incorrect in standard English.
Yes, it is a subordinating conjunction. It connects a restrictive clause.
No, "wow" is not a conjunction. It's an interjection.
It is a conjunction.
There is no conjunction of will not.Maybe you mean contraction.If you do then won't is the contraction
The word are is not a conjunction. It is a verb.
No, it is not a conjunction. The word be is a verb.
no better is not a conjunction
It can be a conjunction, as well as an adverb. As a subordinating conjunction, it connects restrictive dependent clauses.