Yse, in the right context; for example "She had had enough", "Henry had had bad reviews before" or "Bob explained that Keith had had a bad experience before coming to work for the firm". In these cases, the use of "had had" is the Past Perfect Tense of the verb "to have". One major use of this tense is to show that something began in the past and continued until another point in the past.
Yes, saying "repeat twice" is correct in the context of giving a specific instruction to do something twice in a sequence. It is a clear and concise way to communicate the desired action.
The correct grammar is "What else could you ask for?" This phrase is commonly used to express satisfaction or contentment with a situation or outcome.
No, "will be had" is not a correct grammar. The correct grammar would be "will have."
Yes, the word "person" can be made plural by saying "persons" or "people". However, the word "people" sometimes means "tribe"; therefore, it can be made plural by saying "peoples", meaning "tribes".
The correct grammar is: "Are those correct?"
Yes, saying "repeat twice" is correct in the context of giving a specific instruction to do something twice in a sequence. It is a clear and concise way to communicate the desired action.
Depends on the context of the sentence, but yes, most of the time
No, "will be had" is not a correct grammar. The correct grammar would be "will have."
The correct grammar is "What else could you ask for?" This phrase is commonly used to express satisfaction or contentment with a situation or outcome.
My spelling and grammar are excellent. The subject--spelling and grammar--is plural and therefore takes a plural verb. An easy "ear test" is to substitute simpler words. You would say, "It is excellent." You would also say, "They are excellent." Saying "spelling and grammar" is like saying "they" in this context.
Yes, the word "person" can be made plural by saying "persons" or "people". However, the word "people" sometimes means "tribe"; therefore, it can be made plural by saying "peoples", meaning "tribes".
No, it is correct grammar, not a correct grammar.
The correct grammar is: "Are those correct?"
"On a train" is correct grammar.
Two types. By saying there are two 'types' you are already stating that there are 2 differentthings and so the word 'different' isn't necessary.
no it would be "The pupils and I" - Complete answer: Yes and no, it depends on whether it is the subject of the verb or not. We say The teacher watched me and the pupils at the same time. But we say The pupils and I want to go outside.
No, only one "do" is ever needed as part of a verbal phrase: "You said you don't, but you do".