Yes this would be acceptable. For example:
No, "have not have" is not correct. The correct form would be "have not had" in past perfect tense or "have not been having" in present perfect continuous tense.
The present perfect tense is Have/Has Hidden.
The present perfect tense is has/have existed.
Either is correct. "Had gone" is past perfect; "have gone" is present perfect.
Was is a past tense conjugation of be. The present perfect tense of be is have/has been.I/We/You/They have beenHe/She/It has been
yes
No, "have not have" is not correct. The correct form would be "have not had" in past perfect tense or "have not been having" in present perfect continuous tense.
Will buy
An example of this is "She has had a lot of work to do"
Present tense
Yes, when using the present perfect tense.
The present perfect tense is Have/Has Hidden.
The present perfect tense is has/have existed.
Either is correct. "Had gone" is past perfect; "have gone" is present perfect.
To form the present perfect tense, a past participle must be combined with the helping verbs, have, or has (present tense). In this case the verb is 'to be' and its past participle is 'been.' The answer is, "He has been ill."
present tense past tense future tense present perfect tense past perfect tense future perfect tense present progressive tense past progressive tense future progressive tense present perfect progressive tense past perfect progressive tense future perfect progressive tense
Was is a past tense conjugation of be. The present perfect tense of be is have/has been.I/We/You/They have beenHe/She/It has been