It can be, rarely. More often it is an adverb.
In the sentence "He picked up a suitcase, then left" the word then is substituting for the conjunction "and" while alsogiving adverbial information. This is tricky but apparently acceptable usage.
The correct and commonly accepted phrase is “in conjunction with.” “In conjunction to” is generally considered incorrect in standard English.
Yes, it is a subordinating conjunction. It connects a restrictive clause.
There is no conjunction of will not.Maybe you mean contraction.If you do then won't is the contraction
No, it is not a conjunction. It is a contraction. It combines the pronoun YOU and the verb ARE.
No, it is not a conjunction. The pronoun-verb pair "you are" can be replaced by a contraction: the contraction you're.
The correct and commonly accepted phrase is “in conjunction with.” “In conjunction to” is generally considered incorrect in standard English.
It is a conjunction.
No, "wow" is not a conjunction. It's an interjection.
Yes, it is a subordinating conjunction. It connects a restrictive clause.
There is no conjunction of will not.Maybe you mean contraction.If you do then won't is the contraction
The word are is not a conjunction. It is a verb.
No, it is not a conjunction. The word be is a verb.
no better is not a conjunction
It can be a conjunction, as well as an adverb. As a subordinating conjunction, it connects restrictive dependent clauses.
No, it is not a conjunction. It is a contraction. It combines the pronoun YOU and the verb ARE.
No, It is not a conjunction. It can be a noun or an adjective.
it is the same as a coordinating conjunction