Generally, no. Please see: http://execsec.od.nih.gov/help/basics/punctuation.html
No, a person's name with a Roman Numeral does not require a comma.John Smith had a son, to whose name he added the Numeral I.John Smith I had a son John Smith II (John Smith the second)John Smith II had a son John Smith IIIJohn Smith III detested Roman Numerals so he called his son, John Smith, Jr. (with a comma), thus ending the Roman Numeral tradition for this family.
The correct way to write II after a name when the last name is written first is to include a comma before the suffix. For example: Lastname, Firstname II.
Nicholas II's last name was Romanov. His full name was Nicholas II Alexanderovich Romanov.
Suffixes like Jr., Sr., II, III, etc. are typically added after the last name when listing names. For example, John Smith Jr.
A suffix on a job application refers to letters added at the end of a name to further define it, such as Jr., Sr., III, or PhD. It provides additional information about the individual's identity or familial relationships.
no
No, a person's name with a Roman Numeral does not require a comma.John Smith had a son, to whose name he added the Numeral I.John Smith I had a son John Smith II (John Smith the second)John Smith II had a son John Smith IIIJohn Smith III detested Roman Numerals so he called his son, John Smith, Jr. (with a comma), thus ending the Roman Numeral tradition for this family.
The correct way to write II after a name when the last name is written first is to include a comma before the suffix. For example: Lastname, Firstname II.
The proper way to add the suffix of a third generation name would be to simply add a space then three uppercase letters "I". Examples: Vincent Andre Paul II Vincent Andre Paul III Vincent Andre Paul IV Some manuscript styles add a comma and a space after the last name. However, this appears to not be correct at all, unless someone specifically asks for their name to include the comma before the suffix.
II just refers to the second in his family to have that name. I guess you can say so people wont get confused. Like if my grandfather's name was John Smith and my father had that same name, my name would be John Smith III. ---- A son who has exactly the same name as his father is normally styled "junior," as in John F. Smith, Jr. A third generation with the same name would be styled "the third," written John F. Smith III. (Note the comma before "Jr." but not before "III.")When "II" is used ("the second"), it's usually the case that the second is a descendant of but not the son of the first. For example, John F. Smith has a son named George Smith. Then George has a son and names him John F. Smith. He would be styled John F. Smith II ("the second"), after his grandfather, not his father.
george ii
King Edward III
Bernard Garceau III's birth name is Bernard Garceau II.
It depends on how many generations before you had the same name. For example, If your name is John Smith, and both your father and grandfather have the same name, then you would be legally known as John Smith III.
The name of the compound Fe3O4 is called iron (II,III) oxide. (Wikipedia)
double decomposition
Tsar Alexander III, Nicholas's father, was the leader of Russia before Nicholas II.