No — thoroughly is not a conjunction. It’s an adverb used to describe how completely or intensely something is done (e.g., “She thoroughly enjoyed the movie.”).
The correct and commonly accepted phrase is “in conjunction with.” “In conjunction to” is generally considered incorrect in standard English.
Yes, it is a subordinating conjunction. It connects a restrictive clause.
There is no conjunction of will not.Maybe you mean contraction.If you do then won't is the contraction
No, it is not a conjunction. It is a contraction. It combines the pronoun YOU and the verb ARE.
No, it is not a conjunction. The pronoun-verb pair "you are" can be replaced by a contraction: the contraction you're.
The correct and commonly accepted phrase is “in conjunction with.” “In conjunction to” is generally considered incorrect in standard English.
It is a conjunction.
No, "wow" is not a conjunction. It's an interjection.
Yes, it is a subordinating conjunction. It connects a restrictive clause.
There is no conjunction of will not.Maybe you mean contraction.If you do then won't is the contraction
The word are is not a conjunction. It is a verb.
No, it is not a conjunction. The word be is a verb.
no better is not a conjunction
The sentence fragment "although we thoroughly enjoyed the play" is incomplete because it begins with the subordinating conjunction "although," which indicates that it is dependent on an independent clause to provide a complete thought. Without an additional clause to complete the idea, the fragment leaves the reader expecting more information. To correct it, you could attach it to an independent clause, such as "Although we thoroughly enjoyed the play, we felt it was too long."
It can be a conjunction, as well as an adverb. As a subordinating conjunction, it connects restrictive dependent clauses.
No, it is not a conjunction. It is a contraction. It combines the pronoun YOU and the verb ARE.
No, It is not a conjunction. It can be a noun or an adjective.