"When we saw him" is a phrase that functions as a clause in a sentence. It provides additional information about the time or circumstance of an action.
The correct phrase is "I saw it." "I seen it" is not grammatically correct; "seen" is the past participle form of "see" and is used with a helping verb (e.g., "I have seen it").
"What did you see?" "I saw a plane" Saw is the past tense of see.
"The man saw the dog with the telescope." This phrase could be interpreted as the man using the telescope to see the dog, or the dog having the telescope with them.
The correct phrase is "did you see." The auxiliary verb "did" is followed by the base form of the verb "see" in questions in English.
"We" is the simple subject. "saw" is the simple predicate. "a loom" is the direct object. "in a weaver's shop" is a adverbial prepositional phrase that tells where the seeing was done.
If you saw is not a prepositional phrase. If is a conjunction, not a preposition.
No it is Was It A Cat I Saw
The verb phrase in the sentence "Honore Flaugergues first saw his comet in March of 1811" is "first saw." This phrase combines the main verb "saw" with the adverb "first," indicating the timing of the action.
No, this phrase is not a palindrome. Backwards, it would read:"Was uoy tac a ti saw"However, the phrase "Was it a cat I saw?" does read the same forwards and backwards.But you need to rearrange the spacing. The phrase 'Evil rats on no star live' requires not such rearrangement.
Was it a cat I saw. True. Was it a cat you saw. False.
Was it a cat I saw. Palindrome Was it a cat you saw. Not a palindrome.
Yes. The phrases "Was it a cat I saw" and "Was it a rat I saw" are examples of palindromes. "Was it a car I saw" is not a palindrome.
nope
Was it a cat I saw. Palindrome Was it a cat you saw. Not a palindrome.
Yes.
veni vidi perdidiis I came, I saw, I lost(something)but you probably meanveni vidi defui(I came, I saw, I failed)
nit does not it reads "was uoy tac a ti saw"doesnt make sense :]