No, it is not. The term "would lead" is a conditional verb form.
E.g. Any delay would lead to failure.
"Had" is the past tense of the verb "to have". It is not a conjunction. An example of a conjunction would be the word 'and'.
The conjunction is actually "not only...but also." The form "not only that" would refer to an earlier sentence.
In conjunction with
A conjunction is false only when all statements connected by "and" are individually true, but when taken together, they form a false statement. For example, the conjunction "It is raining and the sun is shining" would be false because it's impossible for it to rain and for the sun to be shining at the same time.
No, "would" is an auxiliary verb. Conjunctions are "and, but, or, for."
No. The archaic idiomatic conjunction "would that" (if only, as a wish) is formed by the verb would (conditional of will) and the conjunction that.
both and
both and
'Would have' usually translates to 'would've' as a conjunction.
talented and beautiful
"Had" is the past tense of the verb "to have". It is not a conjunction. An example of a conjunction would be the word 'and'.
The conjunction is "and."A conjunction is a connecting word between two nouns, pronouns, verbs, adjective, or adverbs, or between independent clauses. There are only a few common ones and you can see a list at the related link.
The conjunction is actually "not only...but also." The form "not only that" would refer to an earlier sentence.
In conjunction with
A conjunction is false only when all statements connected by "and" are individually true, but when taken together, they form a false statement. For example, the conjunction "It is raining and the sun is shining" would be false because it's impossible for it to rain and for the sun to be shining at the same time.
No, "would" is an auxiliary verb. Conjunctions are "and, but, or, for."
Not having statistical information, I believe "and" would have to be easily the most commonly used conjunction.