Sing may be transitive or intransitive.
Yes, but not always. "Flourish" is an intransitive verb describing a very high quantity of success as in the sentence: "Due to the rains, the grass flourished." "Flourish" can also be a noun describing a calligraphic or tonal mark as in the sentence: "She would write all of her 'q's with a small flourish on the end."
It can. For example: Q) Suzy threw what? A) A pineapple. OR Q) What was thrown? A) Suzy threw a pineapple.
quashquestionedquenchquellqueryquitquadruplequaffqualifyquantizequakequestionquintuple
i went to my freind's biirthday party last weekend.
Subject is 'They'. Predicate is 'rode'. Verb is an action verb with 'surf' as the direct object. The sentence might answer any of a number of questions.
A conditional statement is much like the transitive property in geometry, meaning if: P>Q and ~N>P then you can conclude: if ~N>Q
questioned
quilted
No. Do your own homework. http://docs.google.com/gview?a=v&q=cache:ZZmsH0jKHH8J:www.cs.utk.edu/~horton/hw1.pdf+For+each+part+give+a+relation+that+satisfies+the+condition+a+Reflexive+and+symmetric+but+not+transitive+b+Reflexive+and+transitive+but+not+symmetric+c+Symmetric+and+transitive+but+not+reflexive%3F&hl=en&gl=us&sig=AFQjCNHGyc1EDhfqj_mu-RV9yTYZZfXl6A
Congruence is basically the same as equality, just in a different form. Reflexive Property of Congruence: AB =~ AB Symmetric Property of Congruence: angle P =~ angle Q, then angle Q =~ angle P Transitive Property of Congruence: If A =~ B and B =~ C, then A =~ C
quit
Yes, but not always. "Flourish" is an intransitive verb describing a very high quantity of success as in the sentence: "Due to the rains, the grass flourished." "Flourish" can also be a noun describing a calligraphic or tonal mark as in the sentence: "She would write all of her 'q's with a small flourish on the end."
im not sure but i think quitting is a q action verb!!??
It can. For example: Q) Suzy threw what? A) A pineapple. OR Q) What was thrown? A) Suzy threw a pineapple.
The statement "if p, then q; and if q, then r; therefore, if p, then r" describes the logical reasoning known as the transitive property. More formally, it can be expressed in symbolic logic as "p → q, q → r, therefore p → r." This is a fundamental concept in logic that illustrates how relationships can be inferred through a chain of implications.
quashquestionedquenchquellqueryquitquadruplequaffqualifyquantizequakequestionquintuple
quaff = to drink deeply