Yes, there was a significant gap between the Anglo-Saxon poor and rich. The rich held wealth, land, and power, while the poor often struggled to make ends meet and had limited social mobility. This divide was reinforced by the feudal system and strict social hierarchies of the time.
Good listeners are attentive, engaged, and focused on understanding the speaker's message. They ask clarifying questions and provide feedback to show they are actively listening. Poor listeners, on the other hand, tend to be distracted, interrupt, or respond inappropriately, leading to misunderstandings and ineffective communication.
Poor listening is a general communication barrier that can hinder effective communication. It refers to not paying attention, being distracted, or not fully comprehending the message being conveyed. It can lead to misunderstandings, lack of clarity, and breakdowns in communication.
The word form of "POOR" is "POVERTY."
The word 'poor' can be a noun (e.g. He gave away his wealth to the poor) or an adjective (e.g. the poor man, a poor performance, a poor result, poor health). Depending on the meaning, we can use words like beggar, very bad, weak ...
Poor is not a gender biased word in hindi. Poor female is the same as poor male. It is called as GAREEB.
The average lifespan during Anglo-Saxon times was around 30-40 years. Infant mortality rates were high, and diseases, lack of medical knowledge, and poor living conditions contributed to the shorter lifespan compared to today.
=== === === === === ===
they were poor
The rich generally have more economic and political power than the poor.
poor people could not efford things to survive
the poor where misteated by the rich because the rich always looked down on poor people:)
rich poor have food don't have food can play have a job
its the difference between good and poor english
reactivity
There difference with money
You may not have a grasp on the terms rich and poor, and the difference between them.
The Spelling ;)