they made language because it would make hunting in groups easier
Eventually the development of language made hunter-gatherer societies stay in one place and build farms. There are still hunter-gatherer societies in the world today.
Hunter-gatherer societies developed language as a means to communicate complex information about their environment, coordinate group activities such as hunting, and strengthen social bonds within the community. Language helped them to share knowledge, pass down cultural traditions, and establish effective strategies for survival.
It is likely that Hunter-gatherer societies in the Paleolithic had language, as communication would have been essential for coordinating food-gathering activities, social interactions, and passing down knowledge and traditions. While there is no direct evidence of their languages, the complexity of their tools and social structures suggests some form of verbal communication.
it did not
Hunter-gatherer societies were relatively small communities and typically nomadic, hunting and gathering at and from known feeding grounds during certain seasons, and moving on to new grounds at an appropriate time. They never took more than they needed at any given time. These societies also had extensive knowledge of the fauna (animals) and flora (plants) unique to particular areas. They developed basic tools to help them hunt and gather, and to utilise their resources. There is usually also a division of labour between the sexes in such societies, with the males doing most of the hunting and the females doing most of the gathering.
is
Eventually the development of language made hunter-gatherer societies stay in one place and build farms. There are still hunter-gatherer societies in the world today.
Characteristics of hunter-gatherer societies included the fact that they tended to be small communities and somewhat nomadic in nature.
Hunter-gatherer societies developed language as a means to communicate complex information about their environment, coordinate group activities such as hunting, and strengthen social bonds within the community. Language helped them to share knowledge, pass down cultural traditions, and establish effective strategies for survival.
Hunter-gatherers followed the game and the indigenous harvest. Settled communities only developed in agrarian culture.
migatory
No, Juliana Barr did not assert that hunter-gatherer societies had no concept of territory or boundaries. In her research, she actually highlights that hunter-gatherer societies often had well-defined territories and boundaries that they understood and respected.
Hunter-Gatherers did not have a food surplus
Hunter-gatherer societies had the benefit of a more varied and diverse diet, intimate knowledge of their environment, and a closer connection to nature through their lifestyle.
They were nomads. :)
It is likely that Hunter-gatherer societies in the Paleolithic had language, as communication would have been essential for coordinating food-gathering activities, social interactions, and passing down knowledge and traditions. While there is no direct evidence of their languages, the complexity of their tools and social structures suggests some form of verbal communication.
false