For swear in the legal sense, it would be affirm or attest.
For swearing, it could be to curse, cuss, or blaspheme.
No, it isn't. However, it is a play on words for the "f" word.
Yes it can, it isn't a swear phrase as such but can be used in the following way Stop f in and blinding You can f and blind in England but not in Wales It is rude to f n blind
"Fricken" is generally considered a mild swear word or a euphemism for a stronger swear word. Its appropriateness may vary depending on the context and audience. Some people may find it offensive, while others may not.
what word can I substitute for constitutes
It is used as a softer alternative to the more common F word.
Probably isn't one, but another word for swear is "cuss."
No, it isn't. However, it is a play on words for the "f" word.
There is no one-word substitute in English for "son-in-law."
The word you want is florist.
Yes it can, it isn't a swear phrase as such but can be used in the following way Stop f in and blinding You can f and blind in England but not in Wales It is rude to f n blind
Sportsmanship is a word substitute for spirit of game
No, swagger is not a swear word.
No, joks is not a swear word.
It's not a swear word. It's not a curse word either. Heck is never a swear word if people think it's a swear word they are completely wrong.
It depends on what your definition of "swear word" is. Some people consider any strong word a "swear" word, while some other people only consider the strongest words "swear" words. Generally, however, "Bollocking" is not considered a swear.
It is seen as one by many people. In theory it is a variation of "freaking" which is often said by people in place of the 'big' f-word swear word.
The word metalworking is one word.