There are several meanings for this word. One common meaning refers to a serious discussion, carried out in either written or spoken communication; and it conveys a meaning of being very knowledgeable about the subject. "The two journalists were engaged in discourse about the presidential election." "He discoursed about the latest trends in social media."
But there is another meaning that is often used in universities: "discourse" refers not just to a conversation, but to what beliefs, myths, or attitudes can be found in certain words that occur during that conversation. Here, a "discourse" refers to how we are taught to speak about a subject. A discourse contains the beliefs (myths, stereotypes, prejudices, assertions, etc) that are commonly accepted by a culture.
Some topics have many differing discourses, since there are many opinions or beliefs about it. For example, there is a discourse about "socialism"-- in American politics, it is usually referred to in a negative way. But in other countries, there are different discourses that are much more positive. Using this meaning, an example is: The French philosopher Michel Foucault wrote about the discourses related to crime and punishment.
Yes. The definition is communication of thought by words. There are plenty of words that you can use to make a sentence with that word.
The word 'discourse' is a noun. An example of a sentence using the word would be: The student seemed nervous during her discourse, even though she was prepared.
That case is simple..As the word defines itself..Direct discourse-that is, a direct quotation or a direct question-means the identical words the writer or speaker used; as,- "I hope you have not killed him?" said Amyas.-Kingsley.Indirect discourse means reported speech,-the thoughts of a writer or speaker put in the words of the one reporting them.Therefore to change direct discourse to indirect discourse it to simply REPORT what the speaker directly says or the writer wrote.In other words, paraphrase the words so as to avoid using QUOTATION MARKS..
meta-discursive is a strategy that is used in discourse to pointing to something that has occurred or that has been mentioned in the prior discourse. For example, if in a prior discourse you encountered the word "meta-discursive", and you are relating it in a novel discourse, you may need to highlight the term or the way in which the term has been define or use in the previous discourse, by using words such as " by which I mean", "so-called" simply to indicate that you have brought it into the discourse from somewhere.
This question was raised in the recent debate in Applied Linguisticsbetween Widdowson and De Beaugrande involved a dispute about therelationship between text and discourse. Widdowson sees the two asdistinction. My reading of his position is that discourse is text inuse but that texts in corpora or presumably other linguisticcollections of language are not discourse. Texts need to be 'broughtto life' to become discourse.De Beaugrande argues that a text cannot be contextualized only shiftedinto a different context. A real text cannot be decontextualised, thatis, removed from any context; we can only shift it into a differentcontext, which is an ordinary transaction not just in languageclassrooms, but in most reports or discussions of what somebody hassaid. (de Beaugrande page 114 from de Beaugrande,R. (2001).The term "discourse" is defined in a number of different ways. For example, as the language use above the level of the sentence, as language use in context and as real language use.Widdowson did not maintain this distinction himself: In 1978 he argued that 'discourse' is made up of sentences having the properties of cohesion & coherence!Yet there is another distinction between these two terms.In this distinction 'text' is defined in terms of being a physical product and 'discourse' is viewed as process and meaning is not derived from text but from reader's interaction with the text(discourse).Discourse analysts examine spoken, signed and written language and may focus on any aspect of linguistic behavior, from the study of particular patterns of pronunciation, through word choice, sentence structure and semantic representation, to the pragmatic analysis of how we organize speech encounters and any combination of these in spoken, written and signed discourse.Discourse analysis is therefore a study of the forms and functions of discourse.For Strubb discourse analysis is analyzing larger linguistic units so it is a matter of extending the scope of grammar .For Harris discourse is establishing formal equivalence within a text and connectedness.Foucault defined discourse as "an entity of sequences of signs in that they are enouncements (Foucault 1969:141).Text can come in all shapes and sizes: they can correspond in context with any linguistic unit: letter, sound, word, sentence, combination of sentence.Widdowson identifies a text not by its linguistic extent but by its social contex. In defense of this claim we can give an example of public notes where a single P letter transfers the meaning of 'place for parking your car'.But identifying something as a text is not the same as interpreting it. We may recognize intentionality but not know the intention. This is where discourse comes in.We achieve meaning by indexical realization, i.e. by using language to engage our extralinguistic reality.For Widdowson discourse is the pragmatic process of meaning negotiation and text as its product.There is some problems with traditional definitions of discourse. If discourse is the study of language pattern above the sentence means that a sentence writ larger quantitively different but qualitatively the same means that we cannot have discourse below sentence level.Or if discourse refers to the degree of sentence then they sign the same meaning and encoding this meaning is semantic realization so discourse is semantic!Harris differs between semantic (the meaning of morpheme) and pragmatic (the intention of the producer) but does not say how?!At the same time Harris is talking about interpretation as the intention of the producer but the meaning to audience is different and he does not give any solution It seems that the two terms discourse and text are same for Harris.Stubbs did not differentiate between discourse and text. He said the terms are often ambiguous and confusing. For him 'discourse' implies length whereas a text maybe very short (Stubbs 1983:3).There are instances of languages which are not separate sentences but appears as public notices and their meaning is realized by outside context to where it is related and how. It means to social knowledge.Texts are of all kinds and length: letters, sound, word, sentence ...It is the intersexuality of a text which makes it to be understood, it means to relate language to extralinguistic reality.As I understood for this chapter a text differs from one discourse to another. By discourse I refer to all the extralingusitics parameters (cultural, social, and political and...).Discourse analysis includes all studying investigating the supra-sentential structure of any stretches of language, spoken or written.And the term 'Text' and 'Text Analysis' lead to confusion. As Tadros (1981) said: "The term 'Text' should be abandoned unless it is used to refer to the physical arrangements of linguistic signals on papers.
Yes. The definition is communication of thought by words. There are plenty of words that you can use to make a sentence with that word.
The word 'discourse' is a noun. An example of a sentence using the word would be: The student seemed nervous during her discourse, even though she was prepared.
Discourse is key to an open, trustworthy,and understanding relationship.
The discourse was only about eachother, therefor no one else was involved.
That case is simple..As the word defines itself..Direct discourse-that is, a direct quotation or a direct question-means the identical words the writer or speaker used; as,- "I hope you have not killed him?" said Amyas.-Kingsley.Indirect discourse means reported speech,-the thoughts of a writer or speaker put in the words of the one reporting them.Therefore to change direct discourse to indirect discourse it to simply REPORT what the speaker directly says or the writer wrote.In other words, paraphrase the words so as to avoid using QUOTATION MARKS..
5 example of sentence direct discourse->describes the direct reporting of what someone said in another context.
Rational discourse concerning the nature of God and His relationship to mankind.
Prescriptive discourse is any discourse that promotes what should be thought, spoken, or done. For example, the sentence 'That window is open' normally expresses a certain descriptive thought (proposition, statement), namely, that that window is open. By way of contrast, the sentence "You should open that window" would normally be used to tell someone what to do, to prescribe a certain action. So prescriptive discourse is normative discourse. It is discourse about what ought to be the case rather than descriptive discourse about what is the case.
I have joined many online forums in the past years.
meta-discursive is a strategy that is used in discourse to pointing to something that has occurred or that has been mentioned in the prior discourse. For example, if in a prior discourse you encountered the word "meta-discursive", and you are relating it in a novel discourse, you may need to highlight the term or the way in which the term has been define or use in the previous discourse, by using words such as " by which I mean", "so-called" simply to indicate that you have brought it into the discourse from somewhere.
1. Direct quotation. 2. Indirect Quotation. 3. Block Quotation
Using petroleum in a sentence?