If there is more than one Lee involved, the proper nominative plural is "Lees" and the genitive plural is "Lees'". "Lee's" would be proper for a singular genitive, as in "the attorney representing the Lee's heirs", when there is only one person named Lee who has heirs.
Fritzes is the plural form. Fritz's is the possessive form. Ex: The Fritzes live next door. The Fritz's dog Molly ran away.
The proper usage is "Lee's" as it indicates possession or belonging to Lee. So, the correct phrase would be "Lee's that" to show that something belongs to Lee.
The correct usage would be for possessive nouns, such as "Sara's book" or "the dog's tail."
When showing possession for a last name ending in "s," the use of an apostrophe depends on the style guide you follow. Both "Jones'" and "Jones's" are considered correct. However, it is more common in modern usage to simply add an apostrophe after the "s" (Jones').
To clarify - does an apostrophe face a certain way? I have seen most that seem to be straight up and down and I have seen some that seem to face to the left. I recently had some type set for a cup imprint and the copy contained Class of '66. Typesetter had the apostrophe facing right like a single quotation mark which did not look correct to me. He said it was the font..Would this be a correct usage?
Fritzes is the plural form. Fritz's is the possessive form. Ex: The Fritzes live next door. The Fritz's dog Molly ran away.
The proper usage is "Lee's" as it indicates possession or belonging to Lee. So, the correct phrase would be "Lee's that" to show that something belongs to Lee.
The correct usage would be for possessive nouns, such as "Sara's book" or "the dog's tail."
"its" never gets an apostophe as a posessive. The conjunction of "it is" abreviates to "it's". so....the scenery of the movie is possesive...it gets no apostrophe. it's a very relaxing hobby is correct. the second usage is the proper usage.
When showing possession for a last name ending in "s," the use of an apostrophe depends on the style guide you follow. Both "Jones'" and "Jones's" are considered correct. However, it is more common in modern usage to simply add an apostrophe after the "s" (Jones').
There is no apostrophe if you are talking about more than one CD which is not possessive.e.g. The shop sold CDs.However, if you were talking about a CD which owned/possessed something, there would be an apostrophe.e.g. The CD's first song was my favourite.
Correct usage: 1. My dad's accounts are named after my grandparents. 2. My dad's accounts' names are Virgilio and Maria.
You need the plural (no apostrophe). Make teachers feel they have a choice.
Both "Stars of David" and "Star of Davids" (no apostrophe) have been used, often a matter of prior or consistent usage. "Stars of David" is grammatically correct.
"Two of them have sent" is correct usage.
To clarify - does an apostrophe face a certain way? I have seen most that seem to be straight up and down and I have seen some that seem to face to the left. I recently had some type set for a cup imprint and the copy contained Class of '66. Typesetter had the apostrophe facing right like a single quotation mark which did not look correct to me. He said it was the font..Would this be a correct usage?
An apostrophe is something that can be used as a contraction or even a name (e.g)Tom's pencil