ther is different between t.g.and .m.l
firstly, modern liguistic is DESCRIPTIVE(to describe the way people speak) , whilst traditional grammar is PRESCRIPTIVE(to prescribe the way people speak, or simply, to tell people how to speak and let people know the correct way of their speaking )secondly, tradition grammar pays more attention to the written form of language, while linguistics attaches more importance to speaking than writing.thirdly, tradtional grammar has been restricted mainly to SYNTAX, that is, the way of words making patterns to form sentences, while linguistics has a boarder scope for researching, eg. pragmatics, psycholinguistics, sociolinguistics, ect. which, accordingly, are out of the scope of traditional grammar.of course, there are other differences between the old and new appoaches to language research, such as Diachronic vs Synchronic and so....
Grammar is a field of study in linguistics that deals with the structure of any given language called syntax such as structural grammar,transformational grammar. Linguistics on the other hand is the scientific study of languages. It incorporates grammar,semantics,phonetics,stylistics and other disciplines to include social sciences eg: in different dialects, socio-economic classes, child language development etc. in order to understand the origins of a particular language and it's place within other language groups.
Structural grammar, also known as descriptive linguistics, emerged in the mid-20th century as a reaction against traditional grammar focused on prescriptive rules. It emphasized an analysis of sentence structure based on syntax and sought to describe how language is actually used by speakers rather than prescribing how it should be used. Structural grammar forms the basis for modern linguistic theories and methodologies.
Some prominent proponents of linguistics include Noam Chomsky, Ferdinand de Saussure, and William Labov. Chomsky's work on generative grammar revolutionized the field, Saussure's structuralism laid the foundation for modern linguistics, and Labov's work in sociolinguistics has had a significant impact on understanding language variation.
There is no difference between modern and functional grammar. The grammar used in our modern language is all traditional. The distinction between modern and functional grammar rests more on how it was traditionally taught. In the past, for example, teachers would teach that a sentence could not end in a preposition, but this is not true. Communicative grammar refers more to a teaching strategy for ESL/Foreign language speakers. Instead of teaching grammar in a traditional method, listening, reading, speaking, and writing are implemented.
firstly, modern liguistic is DESCRIPTIVE(to describe the way people speak) , whilst traditional grammar is PRESCRIPTIVE(to prescribe the way people speak, or simply, to tell people how to speak and let people know the correct way of their speaking )secondly, tradition grammar pays more attention to the written form of language, while linguistics attaches more importance to speaking than writing.thirdly, tradtional grammar has been restricted mainly to SYNTAX, that is, the way of words making patterns to form sentences, while linguistics has a boarder scope for researching, eg. pragmatics, psycholinguistics, sociolinguistics, ect. which, accordingly, are out of the scope of traditional grammar.of course, there are other differences between the old and new appoaches to language research, such as Diachronic vs Synchronic and so....
Grammar is a field of study in linguistics that deals with the structure of any given language called syntax such as structural grammar,transformational grammar. Linguistics on the other hand is the scientific study of languages. It incorporates grammar,semantics,phonetics,stylistics and other disciplines to include social sciences eg: in different dialects, socio-economic classes, child language development etc. in order to understand the origins of a particular language and it's place within other language groups.
G. A. Padley has written: 'Grammatical theory in Western Europe, 1500-1700' -- subject(s): Comparative and general Grammar, Historical Grammar, History, Linguistics, Medieval and modern Latin language
Structural grammar, also known as descriptive linguistics, emerged in the mid-20th century as a reaction against traditional grammar focused on prescriptive rules. It emphasized an analysis of sentence structure based on syntax and sought to describe how language is actually used by speakers rather than prescribing how it should be used. Structural grammar forms the basis for modern linguistic theories and methodologies.
traditional language studies refers to the words which delt with the nature of language prior to the advent of modern linguistics (general linguistics 1916) is regarded as a theoratic foundation to the newer trend of a linguistic study.
Most people regard Saussure as the father of modern linguistics. However, grammar has been discussed an analyzed since ancient Roman and Greek times--and since ancient Chinese and Sanskrit times.
Charles Francis Hockett has written: 'The view from language' -- subject(s): Linguistics, Language and languages 'Language, mathematics, and linguistics' -- subject(s): Generative grammar, Mathematical linguistics 'A manual of phonology' -- subject(s): Phonetics 'The quantification of functional load' -- subject(s): Linguistics, Language and languages, Research 'Refurbishing our foundations' -- subject(s): Linguistics 'Potawatomi' -- subject(s): Potawatomi language, Grammar 'A course in modern linguistics'
Some prominent proponents of linguistics include Noam Chomsky, Ferdinand de Saussure, and William Labov. Chomsky's work on generative grammar revolutionized the field, Saussure's structuralism laid the foundation for modern linguistics, and Labov's work in sociolinguistics has had a significant impact on understanding language variation.
Aldo D. Scaglione has written: 'The theory of German word order from the Renaissance to the present' -- subject(s): Comparative and general Grammar, German language, Grammar, Comparative and general, Historiography, History, Linguistics, Methodology, Word order 'Essays on the arts of discourse' -- subject(s): Modern Philology, Philology, Modern 'Nature and Love in the Middle Ages'
There is no difference between modern and functional grammar. The grammar used in our modern language is all traditional. The distinction between modern and functional grammar rests more on how it was traditionally taught. In the past, for example, teachers would teach that a sentence could not end in a preposition, but this is not true. Communicative grammar refers more to a teaching strategy for ESL/Foreign language speakers. Instead of teaching grammar in a traditional method, listening, reading, speaking, and writing are implemented.
Modern linguistics originated in the 19th and 20th centuries with scholars like Ferdinand de Saussure and Noam Chomsky. Some major contributions include Saussure's structuralist approach to language study and Chomsky's transformational-generative grammar, which revolutionized the understanding of language as an innate cognitive ability.
Some of the most important discoveries in linguistics include Noam Chomsky's theory of Universal Grammar, which suggests that all languages share a common underlying structure; the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, proposing that language influences thought; and Ferdinand de Saussure's work on structuralism, which laid the foundation for modern linguistics.