It's misled. A previous answer incorrectly stated that the past tense of mislead was also mislead, but just pronounced differently so it would rhyme with bed, red, said, wed, etc. That is not right! The past tense of lead is led. The past tense of mislead is misled. When lead is pronounced to rhyme with bed, red, said and wed, then it is a noun == and only a noun -- as in "get the lead out."
The past tense for "mislead" is "misled."
Yes, "mislead" and "misled" are considered homophones in many dialects, as they are both pronounced the same way but have different spellings and meanings. "Mislead" is the present tense form, while "misled" is the past tense form of the same verb.
The past participle of "mislead" is "misled."
the past tense of am is was and the past tense of has is had
The past tense of "has" is "had" and the past tense of "have" is "had."
The past tense for "mislead" is "misled."
No, the past tense of mislead is misled.
Yes, "mislead" and "misled" are considered homophones in many dialects, as they are both pronounced the same way but have different spellings and meanings. "Mislead" is the present tense form, while "misled" is the past tense form of the same verb.
The root word in mislead is lead with mis- acting as a prefix meaning 'bad'.
The past participle of "mislead" is "misled."
the past tense of am is was and the past tense of has is had
The past tense of "has" is "had" and the past tense of "have" is "had."
Was and were are both the past tense of be. The present tense is: I am he is you are they are The past tense is: I was he was you were they were
"will be" is the future tense of "be". The past tense of "be" is "was/were".
The past tense is she did.
The word "were" is past tense. It is the past tense of the verb "to be."
The past tense of "will" is "would". The past tense of "to be" is "was" or "were".