Descriptive grammar seeks to describe how language is actually used it the real world.
Descriptive grammar describes how language is actually used by speakers, focusing on patterns and rules that are observed in natural language. Prescriptive grammar, on the other hand, prescribes rules and norms for how language should be used based on perceived standards of correctness or appropriateness.
As a matter of prescriptive grammar, they are functionally the same. There is no reason why one is right or the other is wrong. As a matter of descriptive grammar, we can say that the phrase "If someone were to" is almost 5 times more common than the other one.
Examples of traditional grammar rules include subject-verb agreement, proper use of punctuation, parallel structure in sentences, and correct usage of pronouns. Traditional grammar focuses on the structural and prescriptive aspects of language.
No, "will be had" is not a correct grammar. The correct grammar would be "will have."
The fundamental difference between UG and prescriptive grammar is that UG is discovered -- like anything in science. People attempt to find out what the rules are that are shared by all human languages. That's UG. Prescriptive grammar is imposed. It doesn't come from scientific investigation, it comes from random, often nonsensical declarations by self-appointed "experts". UG is discovered. Prescription is made up. That's the difference. That's why one belongs to the realm of science and the other doesn't.
A descriptive grammar tries to describe the actual structures and forms of a language. A prescriptive grammar is essentially a list of linguistic do's and don'ts.
Descriptive grammar describes how language is actually used by speakers, focusing on patterns and rules that are observed in natural language. Prescriptive grammar, on the other hand, prescribes rules and norms for how language should be used based on perceived standards of correctness or appropriateness.
As a matter of prescriptive grammar, they are functionally the same. There is no reason why one is right or the other is wrong. As a matter of descriptive grammar, we can say that the phrase "If someone were to" is almost 5 times more common than the other one.
No, today's dictionaries are not purely descriptive. Many dictionaries include prescriptive elements, providing guidance on language usage and proper grammar in addition to defining words. Some dictionaries also aim to reflect changes in language over time while still maintaining certain prescriptive principles.
Examples of traditional grammar rules include subject-verb agreement, proper use of punctuation, parallel structure in sentences, and correct usage of pronouns. Traditional grammar focuses on the structural and prescriptive aspects of language.
No, "will be had" is not a correct grammar. The correct grammar would be "will have."
The fundamental difference between UG and prescriptive grammar is that UG is discovered -- like anything in science. People attempt to find out what the rules are that are shared by all human languages. That's UG. Prescriptive grammar is imposed. It doesn't come from scientific investigation, it comes from random, often nonsensical declarations by self-appointed "experts". UG is discovered. Prescription is made up. That's the difference. That's why one belongs to the realm of science and the other doesn't.
descriptive grammar
No, it is correct grammar, not a correct grammar.
The correct grammar is: "Are those correct?"
"On a train" is correct grammar.
The correct grammar for this sentence is: "When did you send it?"